Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Muscle Coordination and Action01:24

Muscle Coordination and Action

Muscle coordination is a complex and finely tuned process essential for smooth and purposeful movements like flexion, extension, adduction, abduction, and rotation. The human body orchestrates the actions of various muscles working in concert, each with a specific role. Four functional types describe how muscles work together: agonist, antagonist, synergist, and fixator.
Agonists
Agonist muscles, often called prime movers, are the primary muscles responsible for producing a specific movement.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Telephone Games: How Issues With Common Citation Practices Established the Inverse Efficiency Score.

Experimental psychology·2026
Same author

Short-term action-effect bindings encode perceptual transitions rather than perceptual end-states.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same author

Occupational and personal factors contributing to participation in occupational health promotion programs for employees in nursing home facilities: a secondary analysis of the PROCARE study.

BMC nursing·2026
Same author

Compatibility Effects With Simple Lever Tools: A Replication and Extension Beyond Simple Button Responses.

Human factors·2026
Same author

Is multitasking efficient? Different metrics, different conclusions.

Psychological research·2026
Same author

Visual-spatial demands in sports: An empirical survey based study.

Acta psychologica·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 23, 2026

Development of a Novel Task-oriented Rehabilitation Program using a Bimanual Exoskeleton Robotic Hand
06:44

Development of a Novel Task-oriented Rehabilitation Program using a Bimanual Exoskeleton Robotic Hand

Published on: May 20, 2020

Visual and tactile action effects determine bimanual coordination performance.

Markus Janczyk1, Stefanie Skirde, Matthias Weigelt

  • 1Dortmund University of Technology, Department of Psychology, 44227 Dortmund, Germany. janczyk@fk14.uni-dortmund.de

Human Movement Science
|April 28, 2009
PubMed
Summary

Anticipated sensory feedback influences action planning. Motor control models show that visual and tactile feedback from finger movements significantly impact response preparation, challenging previous assumptions.

More Related Videos

Efficiently Recording the Eye-Hand Coordination to Incoordination Spectrum
07:30

Efficiently Recording the Eye-Hand Coordination to Incoordination Spectrum

Published on: March 21, 2019

Applying Incongruent Visual-Tactile Stimuli during Object Transfer with Vibro-Tactile Feedback
05:43

Applying Incongruent Visual-Tactile Stimuli during Object Transfer with Vibro-Tactile Feedback

Published on: May 23, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 23, 2026

Development of a Novel Task-oriented Rehabilitation Program using a Bimanual Exoskeleton Robotic Hand
06:44

Development of a Novel Task-oriented Rehabilitation Program using a Bimanual Exoskeleton Robotic Hand

Published on: May 20, 2020

Efficiently Recording the Eye-Hand Coordination to Incoordination Spectrum
07:30

Efficiently Recording the Eye-Hand Coordination to Incoordination Spectrum

Published on: March 21, 2019

Applying Incongruent Visual-Tactile Stimuli during Object Transfer with Vibro-Tactile Feedback
05:43

Applying Incongruent Visual-Tactile Stimuli during Object Transfer with Vibro-Tactile Feedback

Published on: May 23, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Motor control
  • Cognitive neuroscience
  • Human-computer interaction

Background:

  • Effect-based models propose anticipated perceptual feedback is key for action planning.
  • Discrete bimanual key press responses are often used to study motor control.
  • The role of specific sensory modalities in action planning requires further investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To test the role of anticipated visual and tactile feedback in action planning for discrete bimanual key presses.
  • To investigate how homologous versus non-homologous finger responses are affected by feedback.
  • To examine the contribution of different sensory representations to motor planning.

Main Methods:

  • Two experiments involving discrete bimanual key press responses.
  • Manipulation of visual and tactile feedback associated with homologous and non-homologous finger responses.
  • Analysis of performance differences based on feedback characteristics.

Main Results:

  • The typical finger homology effect was inverted when visual feedback was manipulated (homologous: non-identical; non-homologous: identical).
  • The finger homology effect was reduced when homologous fingers produced non-identical tactile feedback.
  • Both visual and tactile feedback representations contribute to action planning.

Conclusions:

  • Anticipated action effects, including visual and tactile feedback, are crucial for motor planning.
  • The degree of contribution from visual and tactile feedback may vary.
  • Findings support and refine effect-based models of motor control.