Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Synthetic Biology

Synthetic Biology

Synthetic biology is an interdisciplinary science that involves using principles from disciplines such as engineering, molecular biology, cell biology, and systems biology. It involves remodeling existing organisms from nature or constructing completely new synthetic organisms for applications such as protein or enzyme production, bioremediation, value-added macromolecule production, and the addition of desirable traits to crops, to name a few.
Golden rice
Golden rice is a genetically modified...

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...

Genetic Screens

Genetic Screens

Genetic screens are tools used to identify genes and mutations responsible for phenotypes of interest. Genetic screens help identify individuals or a group of people at risk of developing genetic diseases and help them with early intervention, targeted therapy, and reproductive options.
Forward genetic screens
Forward or “classical” genetic screens involve creating random mutations in an organism’s DNA using radiation, mutagens, or insertion of additional bases, which result in visible changes...

The Scientific Method

The Scientific Method

The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...

The Scientific Method

The Scientific Method

Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.

The Scientific Method

The Scientific Method

Chemistry is an empirical science. Scientists often pose questions to understand the chemistry in everyday life and seek answers to these questions. To achieve this, scientists follow a definitive series of steps that together make up the Scientific Method. This approach involves making observations, asking questions, building a hypothesis, conducting experiments, analyzing results, and forming a conclusion.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Technical Aspects of Fecal Microbial Transplantation (FMT).

Current gastroenterology reports·2018

Same author

Testing ocular irritancy in vitro with the silicon microphysiometer.

Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA·2010

Same author

Subspace information criterion for nonquadratic regularizers-Model selection for sparse regressors.

IEEE transactions on neural networks·2008

Same author

Linguistic diversity in deaf defendants and due process rights.

Journal of deaf studies and deaf education·2004

Same author

Access to sign language interpreters in the criminal justice system.

American annals of the deaf·2002

Same author

Patient with trisomy 6 mosaicism.

American journal of medical genetics·2001

Same journal

Functional and Mechanistic Interplay of Host and Viral Alternative Splicing Regulation during Influenza Infection.

Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology·2020

Same journal

Myriad RNAs and RNA-Binding Proteins Control Cell Functions, Explain Diseases, and Guide New Therapies.

Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology·2020

Same journal

Small RNA Function in Plants: From Chromatin to the Next Generation.

Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology·2020

Same journal

U1 snRNP Telescripting Roles in Transcription and Its Mechanism.

Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology·2020

Same journal

The THO Complex as a Paradigm for the Prevention of Cotranscriptional R-Loops.

Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology·2020

Same journal

Biophysical Properties of HP1-Mediated Heterochromatin.

Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology·2020

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 20, 2026

Efficient Sampling of Genetically Encoded Biosensor Design Space Enabled with a Design of Experiments and Automation Workflow

Efficient Sampling of Genetically Encoded Biosensor Design Space Enabled with a Design of Experiments and Automation Workflow

Published on: October 17, 2025

Deconstructing design: a strategy for defending science.

¹Department of Molecular Biology, Cell Biology, and Biochemistry, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA. kenneth_miller@brown.edu

Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology

|September 8, 2009

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Intelligent design (ID) proponents create doubt about evolution. Scientists can debunk ID by seriously examining its claims and following them to their logical, falsifiable conclusions.

More Related Videos

A Protocol for Bioinspired Design: A Ground Sampler Based on Sea Urchin Jaws

A Protocol for Bioinspired Design: A Ground Sampler Based on Sea Urchin Jaws

Published on: April 24, 2016

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules

Published on: July 25, 2013

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 20, 2026

Efficient Sampling of Genetically Encoded Biosensor Design Space Enabled with a Design of Experiments and Automation Workflow

Efficient Sampling of Genetically Encoded Biosensor Design Space Enabled with a Design of Experiments and Automation Workflow

Published on: October 17, 2025

A Protocol for Bioinspired Design: A Ground Sampler Based on Sea Urchin Jaws

A Protocol for Bioinspired Design: A Ground Sampler Based on Sea Urchin Jaws

Published on: April 24, 2016

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules

Published on: July 25, 2013

Area of Science:

Evolutionary Biology
Philosophy of Science

Background:

The intelligent design (ID) movement has gained public traction in the US despite scientific and legal challenges.
ID proponents leverage concepts of fairness and openness to advocate for classroom inclusion, co-opting scientific principles.

Purpose of the Study:

To outline a strategy for scientists to effectively counter intelligent design arguments.
To demonstrate how scientific inquiry can be used to falsify ID claims.

Main Methods:

Analysis of ID arguments using specific case studies like the blood-clotting cascade and human genome data.
Applying the principle of taking ID claims seriously and following them to their logical scientific conclusions, as exemplified by the Kitzmiller v. Dover trial.

Main Results:

Scientific deconstruction of ID arguments is achievable through rigorous examination of their claims.
The strategy effectively falsifies the hypothesis of "design" in a manner understandable to the public and educators.

Conclusions:

Scientists can play a pivotal role in refuting intelligent design by engaging with its claims scientifically.
The Kitzmiller v. Dover trial provides a precedent for using scientific scrutiny to address challenges to evolutionary theory.