Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Wald-Wolfowitz Runs Test II01:17

Wald-Wolfowitz Runs Test II

The Wald-Wolfowitz runs test, commonly referred to as the runs test, is a nonparametric test used to assess the randomness of ordered data. The test evaluates the number of runs, which are consecutive sequences of similar elements within the data. If the number of runs is significantly higher or lower than expected, the data is considered non-random, indicating a detectable pattern or structure.
For binary data, runs are identified using symbols such as + and −, or equivalently, 1s and 0s. In...
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error00:59

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
Random Variables01:09

Random Variables

A random variable is a single numerical value that indicates the outcome of a procedure. The concept of random variables is fundamental to the probability theory and was introduced by a Russian mathematician, Pafnuty Chebyshev, in the mid-nineteenth century.
Uppercase letters such as X or Y denote a random variable. Lowercase letters like x or y denote the value of a random variable. If X is a random variable, then X is written in words, and x is given as a number.
For example, let X = the...
Random Error01:04

Random Error

Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Direct comparison of stochastic driven nonlinear dynamical systems for combinatorial optimization.

Physical review. E·2025
Same author

Quadratic unconstrained binary optimization and constraint programming approaches for lattice-based cyclic peptide docking.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Optimal Thresholds for Fracton Codes and Random Spin Models with Subsystem Symmetry.

Physical review letters·2022
Same author

Optimization and benchmarking of the thermal cycling algorithm.

Physical review. E·2021
Same author

Automated design of pulse sequences for magnetic resonance fingerprinting using physics-inspired optimization.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2021
Same author

Wishart planted ensemble: A tunably rugged pairwise Ising model with a first-order phase transition.

Physical review. E·2020
Same journal

Erratum: Bacterial Turbulence at Compressible Fluid Interfaces [Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 138301 (2026)].

Physical review letters·2026
Same journal

Unveiling Light-Quark Yukawa Flavor Structure via Dihadron Fragmentation at Lepton Colliders.

Physical review letters·2026
Same journal

Adaptable Route to Fast Coherent State Transport via Bang-Bang-Bang Protocols.

Physical review letters·2026
Same journal

Topological Transition and Emergence of Elasticity of Dislocation in Skyrmion Lattice: Beyond Kittel's Magnetic-Polar Analogy.

Physical review letters·2026
Same journal

Pound-Drever-Hall Method for Superconducting-Qubit Readout.

Physical review letters·2026
Same journal

Coupling a ^{73}Ge Nuclear Spin to an Electrostatically Defined Quantum Dot in Silicon.

Physical review letters·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 19, 2026

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

Error threshold for color codes and random three-body Ising models.

Helmut G Katzgraber1, H Bombin, M A Martin-Delgado

  • 1Theoretische Physik, ETH Zurich, CH-8093 Zurich, Switzerland.

Physical Review Letters
|October 2, 2009
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

We analyzed the error threshold of color codes, a type of quantum code. Our findings show these codes have high noise resistance, comparable to Kitaev

More Related Videos

Using Three-color Single-molecule FRET to Study the Correlation of Protein Interactions
11:22

Using Three-color Single-molecule FRET to Study the Correlation of Protein Interactions

Published on: January 30, 2018

A System for Tracking the Dynamics of Social Preference Behavior in Small Rodents
08:38

A System for Tracking the Dynamics of Social Preference Behavior in Small Rodents

Published on: November 21, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 19, 2026

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

Using Three-color Single-molecule FRET to Study the Correlation of Protein Interactions
11:22

Using Three-color Single-molecule FRET to Study the Correlation of Protein Interactions

Published on: January 30, 2018

A System for Tracking the Dynamics of Social Preference Behavior in Small Rodents
08:38

A System for Tracking the Dynamics of Social Preference Behavior in Small Rodents

Published on: November 21, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Quantum Information Science
  • Topological Quantum Computation
  • Statistical Mechanics

Background:

  • Topological quantum codes, such as color codes, are crucial for fault-tolerant quantum computation.
  • These codes offer direct implementation of quantum Clifford gates, essential for entanglement distillation and teleportation.
  • Understanding their error thresholds is vital for practical quantum computing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine the error threshold of color codes.
  • To investigate the relationship between enhanced computational capabilities and noise resistance in quantum codes.
  • To compare the performance of color codes with established codes like Kitaev's toric code.

Main Methods:

  • Mapping the error-correction process to a statistical mechanical random three-body Ising model.
  • Utilizing Monte Carlo simulations to study the phase diagram of the model.
  • Calculating the error threshold from simulation data.

Main Results:

  • The error threshold for color codes was found to be p(c) = 0.109(2).
  • This threshold is remarkably close to that of Kitaev's toric code.
  • The results indicate that advanced computational features do not compromise noise resilience.

Conclusions:

  • Color codes exhibit a high error threshold, demonstrating significant noise resistance.
  • The findings suggest that topological quantum codes can achieve both enhanced functionality and robustness.
  • This research contributes to the development of practical and fault-tolerant quantum computers.