Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 19, 2026

Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies
Published on: February 6, 2019
Dose calculation accuracy using cone-beam CT (CBCT) for pelvic adaptive radiotherapy.
1Department of Radiation Oncology, Good Samaritan Health System, Kearney, NE 68848, USA. huaiqunguan@catholichealth.net
Accurate Hounsfield Unit (HU) calibration is crucial for Varian cone-beam CT (CBCT) in pelvic adaptive radiotherapy. A combined phantom improved calibration, while Catphan 500 proved unsuitable for accurate electron density determination.
Area of Science:
- Medical Physics
- Radiotherapy Technology
- Image-Guided Interventions
Background:
- Adaptive radiotherapy requires accurate dose calculations based on daily imaging.
- Cone-beam CT (CBCT) offers volumetric imaging but requires precise Hounsfield Unit (HU) to electron density (ED) calibration for dose accuracy.
- Standard quality assurance (QA) phantoms may not be optimal for CBCT HU calibration.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the dose calculation accuracy of Varian's CBCT for pelvic adaptive radiotherapy.
- To assess the accuracy of Hounsfield Unit (HU) to electron density (ED) calibration using different phantoms and scan ranges.
- To determine the dosimetric impact of CBCT HU calibration on various radiotherapy treatment plans.
Main Methods:
- Calibrated HU to ED for CBCT using a mini CT QA phantom integrated into an IMRT QA phantom.
- Evaluated Catphan 500 with an annulus for HU calibration, assessing its suitability for bone and air inserts.
- Investigated HU dependence on scatter by varying scan ranges (6 cm, 12 cm, 20.8 cm).
- Acquired and registered CBCT and planning CT for a pelvic phantom.
- Generated single field, 3D conformal, and IMRT plans on both CT datasets.
- Calculated dosimetric differences with and without inhomogeneity correction.
Main Results:
- The combined CT QA and IMRT phantom provided accurate HU calibration.
- Catphan 500 with an annulus yielded inaccurate HU calibration due to unsuitable materials and small inserts.
- Dosimetric differences, particularly with inhomogeneity correction, were primarily attributed to HU calibration discrepancies.
- Maximum dosimetric differences for 6 MV varied: 6.7% (single lateral field), 3.3% (3D conformal), and 2.5% (IMRT).
- 12 cm and 20.8 cm scan ranges showed improved accuracy for specific plan types, with 12 cm optimal for 3D and IMRT.
Conclusions:
- Accurate HU to ED calibration is critical for dose calculation accuracy in CBCT-based adaptive radiotherapy.
- A combined mini CT QA and IMRT phantom is recommended for CBCT HU calibration in pelvic treatments.
- The Catphan 500 phantom is not suitable for CBCT HU calibration due to material and insert limitations.
More Related Videos
09:49A Whole Body Dosimetry Protocol for Peptide-Receptor Radionuclide Therapy (PRRT): 2D Planar Image and Hybrid 2D+3D SPECT/CT Image Methods
Published on: April 24, 2020
07:57Positron Emission Tomography-based Dose Painting Radiation Therapy in a Glioblastoma Rat Model using the Small Animal Radiation Research Platform
Published on: March 24, 2022