Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 18, 2026

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
Published on: August 9, 2024
Pitfalls in evaluating the low-risk chest pain patient
1Department of Emergency Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1313 21st Avenue, Nashville, TN 37232-4700, USA. ian.jones@vanderbilt.edu
Abstract:
Risk stratification and management of the patient with low-risk chest pain continues to be challenging despite the considerable effort of numerous investigators. Evidence exists that a specific subset of young patients can be defined as low risk in whom further testing may not be necessary. A high index of suspicion of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and an understanding of the many, subtle, and atypical presentations of ischemic heart disease are required. The initial history, electrocardiogram (ECG), and biomarkers are important, but serial ECGs and biomarkers improve sensitivity in detecting ACS. Unless chest pain is clearly explained, objective testing, such as exercise treadmill testing, nuclear scintigraphy, stress echocardiography, or coronary computed tomography angiogram, should be considered before, or soon after, discharge.
Related Concept Videos
Angina III: Clinical Manifestations and Assessment
Angina V: Nursing Management
Acute Coronary Syndrome V: Nursing Management
Pericarditis IV: Nursing Management
Assessment of Respiration
Subjective Assessment: Nurses interview the patient to gather information directly during the subjective assessment. It includes questions about the individual's medical history, medications, and symptoms, focusing on past respiratory conditions like asthma or COPD,...
Mitral Valve Prolapse II: Assessment and Management
