Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 15, 2026

Lexical Decision Task for Studying Written Word Recognition in Adults with and without Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment
Published on: June 25, 2019
Text familiarity, word frequency, and sentential constraints in error detection.
Maura Pilotti1, Martin Chodorow, Frances Schauss
1School of Science and Mathematics, New Mexico Highlands University, Las Vegas, NM 87701, USA. mpilotti@nmhu.edu
Proofreading accuracy decreases with high-frequency words and predictable sentences. High predictability, especially from memorization, increases the likelihood of overlooking errors during proofreading.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Human-Computer Interaction
- Linguistics
Background:
- Error detection during proofreading is influenced by word characteristics and sentence predictability.
- Top-down processing, driven by familiarity and constraints, may impact proofreading efficiency.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how word frequency and predictability affect error detection in proofreading.
- To determine if these factors independently or jointly impair the proofreading process.
- To explore the role of pre-task activities (reading, copying, memorizing, paraphrasing) in text familiarity and predictability.
Main Methods:
- Participants engaged in pre-proofreading tasks (reading, copying, memorizing, paraphrasing) with sentences containing errors.
- A proofreading task followed to measure time and accuracy.
- Sentence predictability was manipulated through constraints and familiarity.
Main Results:
- Proofreading times were not affected by prior exposure to sentences.
- Proofreading was slower and less accurate for high-frequency words and highly constrained sentences.
- Prior memorization of highly constrained sentences led to increased error overlooking.
Conclusions:
- Word frequency and sentence predictability significantly impair error detection during proofreading.
- High levels of predictability, particularly from memorization of constrained text, can increase the probability of missing errors.
- Proofreading is susceptible to top-down processing biases influenced by linguistic factors.
Related Concept Videos
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test
Tip-of-the-Tongue Phenomenon
Nonsense-mediated mRNA Decay
Usually, Upf3 binds to an Exon Junction Complex (EJC) at mRNA splice sites. If a ribosome fully translates the mRNA,...
Nonsense-mediated mRNA Decay
Usually, Upf3 binds to an Exon Junction Complex (EJC) at mRNA splice sites. If a ribosome fully translates the mRNA,...
Random and Systematic Errors