Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 15, 2026

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
Noninferiority trial designs for odds ratios and risk differences
1Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, 185 Berry Street, Suite 5700, San Francisco, CA 94107-1762, U.S.A.. joan@biostat.ucsf.edu
This study provides methods for designing noninferiority trials with binary outcomes. It details how to calculate sample sizes and optimal allocation ratios based on the odds ratio or risk-difference margins.
Area of Science:
- Biostatistics
- Clinical Trial Design
- Statistical Inference
Background:
- Noninferiority trials are crucial for evaluating new treatments when demonstrating superiority is not feasible or ethical.
- Defining trial margins on the odds ratio (ψ) or risk-difference (δ) scale impacts design parameter calculations.
- Accurate sample size and allocation ratio determination are essential for trial efficiency and reliable results.
Purpose of the Study:
- To derive constrained maximum likelihood methods for determining noninferiority trial design parameters for binary outcomes.
- To provide algorithms for calculating the common response rate (π(N)), minimum sample size (N), and optimal allocation ratio (γ).
- To investigate the impact of margin scale (odds ratio vs. risk-difference) on power and allocation.
Main Methods:
- Constrained maximum likelihood derivations were used to establish relationships between design parameters.
- An algorithm was developed to compute π(N), N, and γ given control response rates, margin type, and error rates.
- The study analyzed how optimal allocation ratios vary with increasing odds ratio (ψ) and risk-difference (δ) margins.
Main Results:
- Under specific conditions, the common response rate π(N) is a fixed parameter between control and experimental rates.
- Setting π(N) equal to the null hypothesis control rate underestimates required sample size.
- Optimal allocations become imbalanced as ψ increases (γ(ψ)<1), while γ(δ) approaches 1/γ(ψ); ranges of allocation ratios exist for minimum sample size.
Conclusions:
- The derived methods enable precise calculation of design parameters for noninferiority trials.
- Trialists can leverage the relationship between allocation ratios and sample size to balance efficiency and practical considerations.
- Discrepancies in power exist when reporting results on different scales for large margins (ψ>2.5), particularly when designing on the risk-difference scale.
Related Concept Videos
Odds Ratio
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs
Hazard Ratio
For example, in a clinical trial evaluating a...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and case-control studies.

