Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...
Null and Alternative Hypotheses01:16

Null and Alternative Hypotheses

The actual hypothesis testing begins by considering two hypotheses. They are termed  the null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis. These hypotheses contain opposing viewpoints.
The null hypothesis, denoted by H0 is a statement of no difference between the variables—they are not related. This can often be considered the status quo. As  a result if you cannot accept the null, it requires some action.
The alternative hypothesis, denoted by H1 or Ha, is a claim about the population that is...
Inductive Reasoning00:59

Inductive Reasoning

Inductive reasoning is a form of logical thinking that uses related observations to arrive at a general conclusion. It is uncertain and operates in degrees to which the conclusions are credible. As such, inductive arguments can be weak or strong, rather than valid or invalid, and conclusions can be used to formulate testable, falsifiable hypotheses.Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Deductive Reasoning01:16

Deductive Reasoning

Deductive reasoning, or deduction, is the type of logic used in hypothesis-based science. In deductive reasoning, the pattern of thinking moves in the opposite direction from inductive reasoning. It uses a general principle or law to predict specific results. From these general principles, a scientist can predict specific results that remain valid as long as the general principles are correct.For example, a researcher can make specific predictions from the hypothesis "butterflies are attracted...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Communicating Time-to-Event Treatment Effects in Randomized Trials: A Randomized Experiment among General Practitioners.

Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making·2026
Same author

Toward a science of human-AI teaming for decision making: A complementarity framework.

PNAS nexus·2026
Same author

Fake publications in biomedical science: red-flagging method indicates mass production.

Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology·2025
Same author

The role of familiarity and recollection in value-based decisions.

Cognition·2025
Same author

A social network perspective on social cues for COVID risk perception.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

The misalignment of incentives in academic publishing and implications for journal reform.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same journal

Mind wandering during first- and foreign-language reading.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Lexical word processing is unaffected by rapid invisible frequency tagging in reading: Evidence from eye movements.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Anxiety modulates voluntary attentional orienting to emotional gaze cues: Eye movements for pro- and anti-saccades.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Faster key-press responses to front vowels than back vowels when matching heard vowels with represented vowels.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Testing the interleaving effect without response bias: A forced-choice reevaluation of Kornell and Bjork (2008).

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

The impact of social interaction on abstract concepts.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 12, 2026

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

From recognition to decisions: extending and testing recognition-based models for multialternative inference.

Julian N Marewski1, Wolfgang Gaissmaier, Lael J Schooler

  • 1Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany. marewski@mpib-berlin.mpg.de

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
|June 17, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The recognition heuristic, a decision-making strategy, was tested against compensatory models. This research found the recognition heuristic to be the superior predictor of human inferences, even with multiple choices.

More Related Videos

Probing the Limits of Egg Recognition Using Egg Rejection Experiments Along Phenotypic Gradients
07:34

Probing the Limits of Egg Recognition Using Egg Rejection Experiments Along Phenotypic Gradients

Published on: August 22, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 12, 2026

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

Probing the Limits of Egg Recognition Using Egg Rejection Experiments Along Phenotypic Gradients
07:34

Probing the Limits of Egg Recognition Using Egg Rejection Experiments Along Phenotypic Gradients

Published on: August 22, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Decision Science
  • Behavioral Economics

Background:

  • The recognition heuristic is a simple decision strategy where recognition alone guides inference.
  • Previous research debated whether recognition is used non-compensatorily or integrated with other information.
  • Computational models for compensatory integration of recognition were lacking.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To generalize the recognition heuristic to tasks with multiple alternatives.
  • To formally specify and compare computational models of recognition-based decision-making.
  • To evaluate the predictive accuracy of the recognition heuristic versus compensatory models.

Main Methods:

  • Four studies were conducted to investigate decision-making processes.
  • Five competing computational models were specified, including the recognition heuristic and compensatory integration models.
  • Eight model comparisons were performed to assess predictive performance.

Main Results:

  • The recognition heuristic model consistently outperformed compensatory models in predicting inferences.
  • Evidence supports the noncompensatory use of recognition in decision-making, even in complex scenarios.
  • The study provides a formal framework for understanding the recognition heuristic's application.

Conclusions:

  • The recognition heuristic is a robust and accurate strategy for decision-making, particularly when dealing with multiple alternatives.
  • The findings challenge previous interpretations and support the noncompensatory application of recognition.
  • This research offers a validated computational model for recognition-based inference.