Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

High-Level and Low-Level Awareness01:19

High-Level and Low-Level Awareness

Controlled processes in human consciousness represent high-alert mental states where individuals deliberately focus their attention on achieving specific goals. Controlled processes can be seen in situations like mastering new technology, where a person might become so absorbed that they ignore surrounding distractions. Such processes involve selective attention, requiring one to concentrate on particular elements of experience while disregarding others. These are governed by executive...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Average Estimates in Line Graphs Are Biased Toward Areas of Higher Variability.

IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics·2023
Same author

Difficulty limits of visual mental imagery.

Cognition·2023
Same author

Symmetry and spatial ability enhance change detection in visuospatial structures.

Memory & cognition·2022
Same author

Visual working memory for connected 3D objects: effects of stimulus complexity, dimensionality and connectivity.

Cognitive research: principles and implications·2022
Same author

The Science of Visual Data Communication: What Works.

Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society·2021
Same author

Truth or Square: Aspect Ratio Biases Recall of Position Encodings.

IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics·2020
Same journal

EXPRESS: Age-related Differences in Recognition Memory for Discourse: The Case of Modified Words, Competitors, and Related Lures.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

EXPRESS: Exaggerated Self-Referencing in Body Dysmorphic Disorder.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

EXPRESS: Post-Error Adjustments: The role of Response Stimulus Intervals and error placement.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

Mitigating the Low Prevalence Effect: Role of Removing Explicit "Target-Absent" Responses in Visual Search.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

Visual Selection Is Spatially Constrained During Working Memory Consolidation.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

Cross-Phoneme Generalisation of Dimension-Based Statistical Learning for Stop Voicing: Probing Subject Design and Word Frame Effects.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 8, 2026

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking
05:58

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

Complex attentional control settings.

Stacey E Parrott1, Brian R Levinthal, Steven L Franconeri

  • 1Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006)
|September 21, 2010
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Complex attentional control settings guide visual attention. These settings primarily influence later target identity processing, not early attentional selection, according to new research.

More Related Videos

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control
09:37

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Published on: July 5, 2015

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 8, 2026

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking
05:58

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control
09:37

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Published on: July 5, 2015

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Visual Perception

Background:

  • The visual system uses attentional control settings to prioritize goal-relevant information, such as specific features like color.
  • Recent findings suggest these control settings are more complex, allowing monitoring of independent features at different locations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether complex attentional control settings affect early attentional selection or later target processing.
  • To dissociate the timing of attentional control setting effects within the visual system.

Main Methods:

  • Experiment 1: Participants monitored for independent features in the same location but different objects, testing control setting effectiveness.
  • Experiment 2: The cue's ability to prime target identity was removed to create an opposing prediction.
  • Utilized target templates and uninformative cues to assess attentional prioritization mechanisms.

Main Results:

  • Results indicate that complex attentional control settings predominantly impact later stages of target identity processing.
  • The effectiveness of control settings was modulated by feature independence and cue priming, differentiating early vs. late effects.

Conclusions:

  • Complex attentional control settings primarily modulate later target identity processing.
  • These findings refine our understanding of how attentional mechanisms prioritize information in the visual system.