Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 5, 2026

Neuronavigated Focalized Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Administered During Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Published on: November 15, 2024
Transcranial direct current stimulation over the primary motor cortex during fMRI.
Andrea Antal1, Rafael Polania, Carsten Schmidt-Samoa
1Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Georg-August University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany. Aantal@gwdg.de
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) effects on brain activity differ from motor evoked potential (MEP) measures. Anodal tDCS during finger tapping reduced supplementary motor area (SMA) blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) signals, unlike MEPs.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Neuroimaging
- Motor Control
Background:
- Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) modulates corticospinal excitability, with anodal and cathodal polarities inducing facilitatory and inhibitory effects, respectively, as measured by motor evoked potentials (MEPs).
- The relationship between these MEP-based excitability changes and concurrent brain activity, particularly hemodynamic responses measured by blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), remains incompletely understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the online effects of short-duration anodal and cathodal tDCS on human brain activity and associated hemodynamics using concurrent BOLD fMRI.
- To compare the polarity-dependent effects of tDCS on corticospinal excitability (MEPs) with concurrent BOLD fMRI signals in the primary motor cortex (M1) and associated areas.
Main Methods:
- Concurrent BOLD fMRI at 3T was used to measure brain activity during 20-second periods of anodal or cathodal tDCS (1 mA) over the left M1, interspersed with 20-second rest periods.
- Stimulation was applied at rest or during a finger-tapping task. A control experiment involved electrode placement over the occipito-temporo-parietal junction.
- Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were measured to assess corticospinal excitability, while BOLD signal changes were analyzed in various brain regions, including the supplementary motor area (SMA).
Main Results:
- Neither anodal nor cathodal tDCS over M1 induced detectable BOLD signal changes during rest or stimulation.
- Anodal tDCS during finger tapping led to a significant decrease in BOLD response in the SMA compared to finger tapping without stimulation.
- Cathodal tDCS showed a trend towards decreased SMA activity, but not statistically significant. Control stimulation over the occipito-temporo-parietal junction did not affect BOLD signals.
Conclusions:
- The polarity-dependent shifts in corticospinal excitability observed with MEPs following M1 stimulation are not directly paralleled by analogous changes in regional BOLD signals.
- This dissociation suggests that MEPs and BOLD fMRI reflect distinct physiological mechanisms: MEPs indicate transsynaptic excitability of pyramidal neurons, while BOLD reflects net synaptic activity across cortical neurons.
- Short-duration tDCS, while affecting MEPs, does not consistently alter BOLD signals, indicating a complex interplay between direct neuronal excitability and the hemodynamic response.
More Related Videos
13:35Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Simultaneous Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Published on: April 27, 2014
13:56The Use of Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy as a Tool for the Measurement of Bi-hemispheric Transcranial Electric Stimulation Effects on Primary Motor Cortex Metabolism
Published on: November 19, 2014