Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Errors in Global Positioning System01:26

Errors in Global Positioning System

Global Positioning System (GPS) technology has revolutionized navigation and positioning, but its accuracy is often compromised by various errors. These errors, stemming from environmental, satellite, and receiver-related factors, require careful mitigation to ensure reliable performance across applications.Atmospheric ErrorsGPS signals travel through the Earth’s ionosphere and troposphere, introducing delays which affect accuracy. The ionosphere is strongly influenced by charged particles,...
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5% chance...
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic01:25

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the $2,000...
Improving Translational Accuracy02:07

Improving Translational Accuracy

Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...
Improving Translational Accuracy02:07

Improving Translational Accuracy

Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Dissociating the behavioral and computational features of implicit motor learning and explicit perturbation detection.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Dissociating variability from error-based processes in observational learning.

Human movement science·2026
Same author

Imitation performance biases are moderated by perceived accuracy in golf putting.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Dual agonist and antagonist muscle vibration produces a bias in end point with no change in variability.

Experimental brain research·2025
Same author

Causal inference, prediction and state estimation in sensorimotor learning.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2025
Same author

The influence of advanced information on co-representation in a shared finger precuing task.

Experimental brain research·2025
Same journal

A portable solution for simultaneous human movement and mobile EEG acquisition: readiness potential for basketball free-throw shooting.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Effects of tDCS and tACS on operant tactile training: investigating individual differences in neuromodulation efficacy.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Investigating the effects of different exercise protocols on depressive-like behaviors and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) in rodents: a systematic review.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Inward platform translations during treadmill walking enhance lateral weight shift and paretic leg engagement in chronic stroke.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Effects of lumbar disc injury and nociception on trunk motor control during rat locomotion.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Changes in synergy formation and modulation during cyclic finger force production tasks in female adults with dystonic cerebral palsy.

Experimental brain research·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 5, 2026

Methods to Test Visual Attention Online
09:44

Methods to Test Visual Attention Online

Published on: February 19, 2015

Reach adaptation to online target error.

Brendan D Cameron1, Ian M Franks, J Timothy Inglis

  • 1School of Human Kinetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T1Z1, Canada.

Experimental Brain Research
|January 27, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Online error, or immediate target jumps during movement, can lead to reach adaptation. This contrasts with previous findings, suggesting online error does influence motor learning.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 5, 2026

Methods to Test Visual Attention Online
09:44

Methods to Test Visual Attention Online

Published on: February 19, 2015

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Motor Control
  • Human Movement Science

Background:

  • Previous research suggested online error does not induce reach adaptation.
  • The role of online error in motor adaptation requires further investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To re-examine reach adaptation to online target error.
  • To investigate the influence of small target perturbations and limited limb vision on adaptation.

Main Methods:

  • Comparison of three groups: terminal error, online error, and control.
  • Participants performed look-and-point movements with visual feedback of the limb only at the start and end.
  • Online error involved immediate target jumps at saccade onset; terminal error involved target jumps upon limb landing.

Main Results:

  • Both terminal error and online error groups exhibited significant aftereffects.
  • This indicates that online error can indeed lead to reach adaptation.

Conclusions:

  • Contrary to previous suggestions, online error appears to contribute to reach adaptation.
  • The experimental design, with small perturbations and limited visual feedback, may facilitate the detection of online error adaptation.