Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 11, 2026

Prehospital Thrombolysis: A Manual from Berlin
Published on: November 26, 2013
New developments in thrombolytic therapy
Insights
Thrombolytic agents like streptokinase and recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (rt-PA) treat cardiovascular disease by dissolving blood clots. Recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (rt-PA) shows higher efficacy in reperfusion compared to streptokinase.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Pharmacology
- Hematology
Background:
- Thrombotic cardiovascular diseases are leading causes of death and disability.
- Thrombolysis, using plasminogen activators, dissolves blood clots by converting plasminogen to plasmin.
- Plasmin degrades fibrin but can also affect hemostatic components, leading to bleeding risks.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review current thrombolytic agents for acute myocardial infarction.
- To compare the efficacy and safety of different thrombolytic therapies.
- To assess the potential of thrombolytic therapy as a routine treatment for acute myocardial infarction.
Main Methods:
- Review of clinical data and comparative studies of thrombolytic agents.
- Analysis of efficacy, fibrin-specificity, and side effect profiles.
- Examination of cost-effectiveness and impact on mortality and infarct size.
Main Results:
- Recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (rt-PA) is more effective and fibrin-specific than streptokinase for acute myocardial infarction.
- Streptokinase recanalizes 40-45% of coronary arteries and reduces mortality by 25% at a lower cost.
- rt-PA achieves higher reperfusion rates (65-70%) but at a significantly higher cost; bleeding and reocclusion rates are similar for both.
- APSAC offers similar efficacy to streptokinase with bolus administration advantage.
- scu-PA demonstrates greater fibrin-specificity than urokinase, with limited comparative data.
Conclusions:
- Thrombolytic therapy is poised to become routine for early acute myocardial infarction.
- While rt-PA shows superior reperfusion, its mortality benefit over streptokinase requires further large-scale trials.
- The choice of thrombolytic agent involves balancing efficacy, safety, cost, and administration method.
Abstract:
Thrombotic complications of cardiovascular disease are a main cause of death and disability and, consequently, thrombolysis could favorably influence the outcome of such life-threatening diseases as myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular thrombosis and venous thromboembolism. Thrombolytic agents are plasminogen activators that convert plasminogen, the inactive proenzyme of the fibrinolytic system in blood, to the proteolytic enzyme plasmin. Plasmin dissolves the fibrin of a blood clot, but may also degrade normal components of the hemostatic system and predispose to bleeding. Currently, five thrombolytic agents are either approved for clinical use or under clinical investigation in patients with acute myocardial infarction. These include streptokinase, urokinase, recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (rt-PA), anisoylated plasminogen streptokinase activator complex (APSAC) and single chain urokinase-type plasminogen activator (scu-PA, prourokinase). The first generation thrombolytic agents, streptokinase (and probably also urokinase), are only moderately efficacious and their administration is associated with extensive systemic fibrinogen breakdown. In comparative studies performed in patients with acute myocardial infarction, recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (rt-PA) is a more effective and fibrin-specific thrombolytic agent than streptokinase. The acylated plasminogen streptokinase activator complex (APSAC) has a profile of thrombolytic efficacy and fibrin-specificity that is similar or somewhat better than that of streptokinase, but has the advantage that it can be administered by bolus injection. Single chain urokinase-type plasminogen activator is more fibrin-specific than urokinase. Comparative data on the efficacy and safety of this agent are limited as it is in the early stage of clinical investigation. Reduction of infarct size, preservation of ventricular function and/or reduction in mortality has been observed with streptokinase, rt-PA and APSAC. Therefore, thrombolytic therapy will probably become routine therapy for early acute myocardial infarction. In patients with acute myocardial infarction, intravenous streptokinase recanalizes 40-45 percent of occluded coronary arteries and reduces mortality by 25 percent; it costs approximately $200 for a therapeutic dose of 1,500,000 units. Recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (rt-PA) is more potent for coronary arterial thrombolysis, producing both more rapid and more frequent (65-70 percent) reperfusion, but it costs over $1,000 for a therapeutic dose of 100 mg. Side effects (mainly bleeding) and the incidence of reocclusion associated with the use of streptokinase and rt-PA are not markedly different. Whether the higher efficacy of rt-PA will translate into a comparably larger reduction of mortality remains to be determined in large comparative clinical trials.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
Related Concept Videos
Anticoagulant Drugs: Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins
Clot Retraction and Fibrinolysis
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care

