Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 3, 2026
11:24
Optimized Fabrication Procedure for High-Quality Graphene-based Moiré Superlattice Devices
Published on: July 11, 2025
Spin and the honeycomb lattice: lessons from graphene
Matthew Mecklenburg1, B C Regan
1Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095, USA.
Physical Review Letters
|April 8, 2011
Summary
Graphene's pseudospin, previously thought analogous to electron spin, is a real angular momentum. This finding explains phenomena in carbon nanotubes and graphene, and suggests space itself may have substructure.
Area of Science:
- Condensed Matter Physics
- Quantum Mechanics
- Materials Science
Background:
- Electrons in graphene exhibit low-energy excitations described by a Dirac equation.
- Graphene's honeycomb lattice introduces a 'pseudospin' due to inequivalent atomic sites.
- Pseudospin has been considered analogous to electron spin, not a distinct physical property.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the true nature of pseudospin in graphene.
- To determine if pseudospin is a real angular momentum.
- To explore the implications of pseudospin being a real angular momentum.
Main Methods:
- Modeling electron behavior in graphene's honeycomb lattice.
- Analyzing low-energy electronic excitations.
- Comparing pseudospin properties to known angular momentum characteristics.
Main Results:
- Graphene's pseudospin is identified as a real angular momentum.
- This identification explains suppressed electron backscattering in carbon nanotubes.
- It also accounts for the angular dependence of light absorption in graphene.
Conclusions:
- Pseudospin in graphene is a fundamental angular momentum, not merely an analogy.
- This provides a new perspective on electron behavior in materials.
- The findings suggest that space itself may possess a hidden substructure giving rise to half-integer spin.
Related Concept Videos
02:18Network Covalent Solids
Network covalent solids contain a three-dimensional network of covalently bonded atoms as found in the crystal structures of nonmetals like diamond, graphite, silicon, and some covalent compounds, such as silicon dioxide (sand) and silicon carbide (carborundum, the abrasive on sandpaper). Many minerals have networks of covalent bonds.
To break or to melt a covalent network solid, covalent bonds must be broken. Because covalent bonds are relatively strong, covalent network solids are typically...
To break or to melt a covalent network solid, covalent bonds must be broken. Because covalent bonds are relatively strong, covalent network solids are typically...
01:17Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling
Coupling interactions are strongest between NMR-active nuclei bonded to each other, where spin information can be transmitted directly through the pair of bonding electrons. While nuclei polarize their electrons to the opposite spins, the bonding electron pair has opposite spins. Configurations with antiparallel nuclear spins are expected to be lower in energy. When coupling makes antiparallel states more favorable, J is considered to have a positive value. The one-bond coupling constant, 1J,...
01:20Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
Two NMR-active nuclei bonded to a central atom can be involved in geminal or two-bond coupling. Geminal coupling is commonly seen between diastereotopic protons in chiral molecules and unsymmetrical alkenes, among others.
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
02:42Valence Bond Theory
Coordination compounds and complexes exhibit different colors, geometries, and magnetic behavior, depending on the metal atom/ion and ligands from which they are composed. In an attempt to explain the bonding and structure of coordination complexes, Linus Pauling proposed the valence bond theory, or VBT, using the concepts of hybridization and the overlapping of the atomic orbitals. According to VBT, the central metal atom or ion (Lewis acid) hybridizes to provide empty orbitals of suitable...
02:54Trends in Lattice Energy: Ion Size and Charge
An ionic compound is stable because of the electrostatic attraction between its positive and negative ions. The lattice energy of a compound is a measure of the strength of this attraction. The lattice energy (ΔHlattice) of an ionic compound is defined as the energy required to separate one mole of the solid into its component gaseous ions. For the ionic solid sodium chloride, the lattice energy is the enthalpy change of the process:
01:08Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview
In bromoethane, the three methyl protons are coupled to the two methylene protons that are three bonds away. In accordance with the n+1 rule, the signal from the methyl protons is split into three peaks with 1:2:1 relative intensities. The methylene protons appear as a quartet, with the relative intensities of 1:3:3:1.
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must have a...
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must have a...