Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 1, 2026

Catheter Ablation in Combination With Left Atrial Appendage Closure for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: February 26, 2013
Prognostic significance of atrial arrhythmias in a primary prevention ICD population
Isabelle C van Gelder1, Huy M Phan, Bruce L Wilkoff
1Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. I.C.van.Gelder@thorax.umcg.nl
Insights
Patients with atrial arrhythmias receiving primary prevention implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) face a higher risk of ICD shocks, particularly inappropriate shocks. However, atrial arrhythmias did not increase mortality risk in these patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
- Medical Devices
Background:
- Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are crucial for preventing sudden cardiac death.
- Atrial arrhythmias are common in patients with cardiac conditions.
- The impact of atrial arrhythmias on ICD outcomes in primary prevention patients requires further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine if primary prevention ICD patients with atrial arrhythmias have an increased risk of ICD shocks and mortality.
- To compare outcomes between patients with and without atrial arrhythmias during ICD follow-up.
Main Methods:
- A subanalysis of the PREPARE study included 537 patients with dual or biventricular devices.
- Patients were categorized based on the presence (n=133) or absence (n=404) of atrial tachycardia/atrial fibrillation (AT/AF) detected via device diagnostics.
- Primary outcomes included ICD shocks and mortality, with a mean follow-up of 333 days.
Main Results:
- Overall, 8% of patients experienced ICD shocks within 1 year.
- Patients with AT/AF had a significantly higher incidence of shocks (13.0% vs. 6.9%, P=0.03), with inappropriate shocks being more frequent (6.9% vs. 2.6%, P=0.02).
- Mortality rates were similar between groups; however, high ventricular rates during AT/AF increased inappropriate shock risk.
Conclusions:
- Primary prevention ICD patients with AT/AF are at increased risk for ICD shocks, especially inappropriate ones.
- Atrial arrhythmias in this population do not appear to be associated with higher mortality.
- Device diagnostics are valuable for identifying patients at risk for shocks.
Introduction:
We investigated whether primary prevention implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) patients with atrial arrhythmias are at higher risk for ICD shocks and mortality compared to patients without atrial arrhythmias in a subanalysis of the PREPARE study.
Methods And Results:
Details of the PREPARE study design and results have been previously reported. We now included 537 of the 700 patients enrolled in PREPARE. These patients had a dual or biventricular device and at least one device follow-up after implantation. Continuously collected device diagnostics data were used to classify patients into two groups during follow-up: with (n = 133) or without (n = 404) atrial tachycardia/atrial fibrillation (AT/AF). The primary outcomes were ICD shocks and mortality. Subjects were followed for a mean of 333 ± 73 (range 5-365) days. During a follow-up of 1 year, ICD shocks occurred in 44 (8%) patients. Significantly, more patients with AT/AF received a shock (13.0% vs 6.9%, P = 0.03), with inappropriate shocks accounting for the majority of the difference (6.9% vs 2.6%, P = 0.02). There was no difference in prevalence of shocks between patients with and without a history of AF. Mortality was similar in patients with and without AT/AF, whether detected during the study or prior to the study. In addition, the 34 subjects with high average ventricular rate (≥110 beats per minute) during AT/AF had a higher risk of an inappropriate shock (21.0% vs 2.1%, P < 0.01).
Conclusion:
Primary prevention ICD patients with AT/AF are more likely to receive shocks, especially inappropriate shocks. Mortality was not higher in AT/AF patients. (PACE 2011; 34:1070-1079).
More Related Videos
16:40A New Single Chamber Implantable Defibrillator with Atrial Sensing: A Practical Demonstration of Sensing and Ease of Implantation
Published on: February 28, 2012
05:43Determination of Continuity Index Values in Atrial Fibrillation Ablation with Proactive Esophageal Cooling
Published on: April 19, 2024
Related Concept Videos
ECG Interpretation of Arrhythmias II: Atrial, Junctional and Ventricular Arrhythmias
Dysrhythmias V: Evaluating Dysrhythmias
Disturbances in Heart Rhythm
Arrhythmias are categorized by their speed, rhythm, and origin. A slow heart...
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class II Agents as β-Adrenergic Blockers
ECG Interpretation of Arrhythmias I: Sinus Arrhythmias
Types of Arrhythmias
Sinus Node Arrhythmias
Sinus Bradycardia: Originating from the sinoatrial (SA) node, sinus bradycardia involves slower impulses, resulting in a heart rate of less than 60 beats per minute (bpm). Causes include sleep, vagal stimulation, beta-blockers, hypothyroidism, and...
Dysrhythmias VI: Management of Dysrhythmias