Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Optimization of survey protocols for MRI.

E R McVeigh1, R M Henkelman, M J Bronskill

  • 1Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Canada.

Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
|February 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Coronary artery calcium and cardiovascular disease prediction by scanner type: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis.

Clinical radiology·2022
Same author

Multiple-mouse magnetic resonance imaging with cryogenic radiofrequency probes for evaluation of brain development.

NeuroImage·2022
Same author

Deformable Known Component Model-Based Reconstruction for Coronary CT Angiography.

Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering·2021
Same author

Kctd13-deficient mice display short-term memory impairment and sex-dependent genetic interactions.

Human molecular genetics·2018
Same author

Spatial gene expression analysis of neuroanatomical differences in mouse models.

NeuroImage·2017
Same author

Zebrafish models of idiopathic scoliosis link cerebrospinal fluid flow defects to spine curvature.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2016
Same journal

Feasibility and SNR Performance of Hyperpolarized <sup>129</sup>Xe Gas Exchange Imaging Using a Balanced SSFP Sequence.

Magnetic resonance in medicine·2026
Same journal

Multi-Contrast Human Brain CEST MRI at 11.7 T: First In Vivo Demonstration.

Magnetic resonance in medicine·2026
Same journal

Suppression of Oscillation and Ghosting in RF-Spoiled Gradient-Echo-Based Dynamic Imaging.

Magnetic resonance in medicine·2026
Same journal

A Simple, Dynamic Geometric Phantom for MRI and CT Reconstruction Pipelines: Beyond Shepp-Logan.

Magnetic resonance in medicine·2026
Same journal

7T 3D-EPI PCASL With High SNR Efficiency and Robustness to Through-Plane B<sub>0</sub> Field Gradients.

Magnetic resonance in medicine·2026
Same journal

A Comparison of Tissue Property Values Estimated Using Conventional Cardiac MRF and MT-Cardiac MRF.

Magnetic resonance in medicine·2026
See all related articles

This study introduces a method to assess Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) protocol sensitivity to tissue parameter variations. It aids in selecting optimal MRI imaging protocols for lesion detection and tissue segmentation.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging
  • Biophysics
  • Computational Biology

Background:

  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) protocols are crucial for medical diagnostics.
  • Optimizing MRI protocols is essential for accurate tissue characterization and lesion detection.
  • Current methods may lack comprehensive sensitivity analysis across diverse tissue parameters.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a method for evaluating MRI protocol sensitivity to multiple tissue parameters.
  • To provide a framework for selecting optimal MRI imaging parameters for specific clinical applications.
  • To enhance the reliability of MRI for lesion detection and tissue segmentation.

Main Methods:

  • Modeling data acquisition as a mapping from tissue parameter space to signal space.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analyzing the characteristics of the resulting signal manifold.
  • Developing a figure of merit to quantify the discriminative power of MRI protocols.

    • Main Results:

    • A novel method for evaluating MRI protocol sensitivity to arbitrary tissue parameter changes.
    • Demonstrated utility in selecting optimal imaging parameters for survey protocols and segmentation algorithms.
    • Quantified protocol efficacy based on signal manifold properties.

    Conclusions:

    • The presented method offers a robust approach to MRI protocol optimization.
    • Improved protocol selection can enhance lesion detection and tissue segmentation accuracy.
    • This framework facilitates the development of more sensitive and specific MRI techniques.