Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 30, 2026

08:12
A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
Published on: March 1, 2022
The joint distribution criterion and the distance tests for selective probabilistic causality
Ehtibar N Dzhafarov1, Janne V Kujala
1Department of Psychological Sciences, Purdue University West Lafayette, IN, USA.
Frontiers in Psychology
|August 12, 2011
Summary
This study defines selective influence for random variables and factors, introducing a joint distribution criterion. It extends distance tests to complex experimental designs, simplifying their application.
Area of Science:
- Psychology
- Statistics
- Mathematics
Background:
- Selective influence is crucial for understanding causal relationships in experiments.
- Existing criteria for selective influence were limited to simple experimental designs.
- Generalizing these criteria is essential for analyzing complex factorial experiments.
Purpose of the Study:
- To formulate a general definition and criterion for selective influence in arbitrary factorial designs.
- To extend existing distance tests for selective influence to accommodate complex experimental setups.
- To provide a unified framework for analyzing selective influence across diverse research areas.
Main Methods:
- Development of a general definition and a necessary and sufficient condition (joint distribution criterion) for selective influence.
- Extension of distance tests, previously applied to two-by-two designs, to arbitrary sets of factors and random variables.
- Application of the generalized distance tests to all extractable two-by-two designs within a given factorial structure.
Main Results:
- A precise mathematical criterion (joint distribution criterion) for selective influence is established for generalized random variables.
- Distance tests are successfully generalized, providing necessary conditions for selective influence in complex designs.
- The generalized distance tests are shown to be applicable by examining all constituent two-by-two designs.
Conclusions:
- The joint distribution criterion offers a robust method for assessing selective influence in complex experimental settings.
- The generalized distance tests provide a practical and simplified approach to analyzing selective influence in arbitrary factorial designs.
- This work unifies the study of selective influence across various experimental complexities, enhancing statistical rigor.
Related Concept Videos
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II
The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I
The Bradford Hill criteria are a group of principles that provide a framework to determine a causal relationship between a specific factor and a disease. There are nine criteria that are pivotal in assessing causality in epidemiological studies. Here's a closer look at Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality criteria with definitions and examples:
Introduction to Test of Independence
In statistics, the term independence means that one can directly obtain the probability of any event involving both variables by multiplying their individual probabilities. Tests of independence are chi-square tests involving the use of a contingency table of observed (data) values.
The test statistic for a test of independence is similar to that of a goodness-of-fit test:
The test statistic for a test of independence is similar to that of a goodness-of-fit test:
Causality in Epidemiology
Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...
Test for Homogeneity
The goodness–of–fit test can be used to decide whether a population fits a given distribution, but it will not suffice to decide whether two populations follow the same unknown distribution. A different test, called the test for homogeneity, can be used to conclude whether two populations have the same distribution. To calculate the test statistic for a test for homogeneity, follow the same procedure as with the test of independence. The hypotheses for the test for homogeneity can be stated as...
Probability Distributions
The probability of a random variable x is the likelihood of its occurrence. A probability distribution represents the probabilities of a random variable using a formula, graph, or table. There are two types of probability distribution– discrete probability distribution and continuous probability distribution.
A discrete probability distribution is a probability distribution of discrete random variables. It can be categorized into binomial probability distribution and Poisson probability...
A discrete probability distribution is a probability distribution of discrete random variables. It can be categorized into binomial probability distribution and Poisson probability...
