Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 29, 2026

Chronic Implantation of Multiple Flexible Polymer Electrode Arrays
08:54

Chronic Implantation of Multiple Flexible Polymer Electrode Arrays

Published on: October 4, 2019

Craniofacial implant surgery.

Douglas P Sinn1, Edmond Bedrossian, Allison K Vest

  • 1Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Surgery, UT Southwestern Medical School at Dallas, 5323 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, TX 75390, USA. drsinn@afoms.com

Dental Clinics of North America
|September 22, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Robot-Assisted Zygomatic Implant Placement for Hemimaxillectomy Defect Reconstruction: A Case Series.

The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants·2026
Same author

Craniofacial Prosthetic Reconstruction: A 25-Year Anaplastology Experience.

The Journal of craniofacial surgery·2026
Same author

Avoiding Complication: The Role of Human Factors in Maxillary Sinus Augmentation. A Narrative Review.

Clinical implant dentistry and related research·2025
Same author

Full Mouth Reconstruction with Dental Implants: Planning, Surgical, and Prosthetic Phase.

Dental clinics of North America·2025
Same author

ITI consensus report on zygomatic implants: indications, evaluation of surgical techniques and long-term treatment outcomes.

International journal of implant dentistry·2023
Same author

The Reverse Scan Body Protocol: Completing the Digital Workflow.

Compendium of continuing education in dentistry (Jamesburg, N.J. : 1995)·2023
Same journal

Contemporary Oral and Maxillofacial Trauma: A Dental Perspective.

Dental clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

The Expanding Role of Virtual Surgical Planning in Maxillofacial Trauma Management.

Dental clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Revision Surgery for Occlusal Correction in Facial Trauma.

Dental clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Mandibular Condylar Fractures and Occlusal Management.

Dental clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Occlusion Management in Facial Trauma: A Literature Review.

Dental clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Dental Implants in Rehabilitation of Patients with Facial Trauma: a Review of Most Current Practices.

Dental clinics of North America·2026
See all related articles

Extraoral cranial implant-retained prostheses offer a successful solution for reconstructing large craniofacial defects, including eyes, ears, and nose. This method is particularly beneficial for burn patients and those with congenital conditions when other treatments fail.

Area of Science:

  • Craniofacial surgery
  • Prosthodontics
  • Biomedical engineering

Background:

  • Reconstruction of extensive craniofacial defects presents significant challenges.
  • Traditional methods may be insufficient for complex cases, particularly in burn survivors and individuals with congenital anomalies.
  • Extraoral implant-retained prostheses offer a specialized approach for prosthetic rehabilitation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the success and viability of extraoral cranial implant-retained prosthetic reconstructions.
  • To highlight the application of these reconstructions for replacing facial structures like eyes, ears, and nose.
  • To identify patient populations who benefit most from this reconstructive technique.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing implant-retained prostheses anchored to the cranial bone for facial restoration.

More Related Videos

Treatment of Facial Deformities using 3D Planning and Printing of Patient-Specific Implants
07:11

Treatment of Facial Deformities using 3D Planning and Printing of Patient-Specific Implants

Published on: May 23, 2020

3D Planning and Printing of Patient Specific Implants for Reconstruction of Bony Defects
08:15

3D Planning and Printing of Patient Specific Implants for Reconstruction of Bony Defects

Published on: August 4, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 29, 2026

Chronic Implantation of Multiple Flexible Polymer Electrode Arrays
08:54

Chronic Implantation of Multiple Flexible Polymer Electrode Arrays

Published on: October 4, 2019

Treatment of Facial Deformities using 3D Planning and Printing of Patient-Specific Implants
07:11

Treatment of Facial Deformities using 3D Planning and Printing of Patient-Specific Implants

Published on: May 23, 2020

3D Planning and Printing of Patient Specific Implants for Reconstruction of Bony Defects
08:15

3D Planning and Printing of Patient Specific Implants for Reconstruction of Bony Defects

Published on: August 4, 2020

  • Focusing on reconstructions involving the eyes, ears, nose, and extensive midface defects.
  • Application in cases where autogenous tissue reconstruction has failed or is not feasible.
  • Main Results:

    • Extraoral cranial implant-retained prosthetic reconstructions demonstrate high success rates.
    • Effective restoration of missing facial structures, including eyes, ears, and nose.
    • Successful management of large and complex craniofacial defects, offering a viable alternative when other options are limited.

    Conclusions:

    • Extraoral implant-retained prostheses are a highly successful reconstructive option for challenging craniofacial defects.
    • This technique provides a crucial treatment avenue for patients with severe defects, including those from burns or congenital conditions.
    • Cranial implant prosthetics should be strongly considered for difficult craniofacial reconstructions.