Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 26, 2026

12:26
An Invasive Method for the Activation of the Mouse Dentate Gyrus by High-frequency Stimulation
Published on: June 2, 2018
Can the F-Response be Volitionally Repressed during Functional Electrical Stimulation?
Rune Thorsen1, Ilaria Carpinella, Maurizio Ferrarin
1Centro di Bioingegneria FDG, Found. Don Carlo Gnocchi ONLUS IRCCS, Milano, Italy.
Neuromodulation : Journal of the International Neuromodulation Society
|December 14, 2011
Summary
Neurologically normal subjects cannot volitionally repress the F-response, even with visual feedback. This finding is crucial for designing neural prostheses using functional electrical stimulation (FES) and myoelectric signal (MES) control.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Biomedical Engineering
- Rehabilitation Technology
Background:
- The F-response, a muscle response to nerve stimulation, is utilized in clinical diagnostics.
- Understanding and controlling the F-response is critical for developing advanced neural prostheses.
- Functional electrical stimulation (FES) and volitional myoelectric signal (MES) control are key components in neural prosthesis design.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate whether individuals can voluntarily suppress the F-response.
- To assess the impact of volitional control on F-response levels during functional electrical stimulation (FES).
- To inform the design of neural prostheses by understanding F-response modifiability.
Main Methods:
- Ten neurologically normal subjects participated in a training protocol.
- Subjects received visual feedback of their F-response level from the anterior tibial muscle during nerve stimulation.
- The F-response level was digitally processed and analyzed across multiple sessions and trials.
Main Results:
- A significant increase in F-response level was observed during constant stimulation periods.
- A significant decrease in F-response was noted from the first to the last test within a session.
- No significant change in F-response was found across different sessions, indicating a lack of long-term volitional learning.
Conclusions:
- Volitional repression of the F-response is not achievable, even with feedback.
- Local changes in F-response may occur, but sustained voluntary control is not demonstrated.
- F-waves must be accounted for in myoelectric control systems, necessitating strategies like F-interval elimination.

