Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior01:28

Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior

Automatic processing refers to the cognitive operations that occur without conscious intent or awareness, playing a fundamental role in shaping social cognition and behavior. These processes enable individuals to navigate complex social environments efficiently by relying on mental shortcuts and pre-existing knowledge structures known as schemas. One of the most influential mechanisms underlying automatic processing is priming, which subtly activates mental representations through exposure to...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

When arrows behave like eyes: Reversal of spatial stroop interference by visual masking.

Cognition·2026
Same author

Selective attention in adults with major depressive disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis of task-specific differences and negative bias.

Comprehensive psychiatry·2026
Same author

Top-down preparation contributes to intertrial priming in singleton search.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2025
Same author

Preparing to attend in a two-target task.

Psychological research·2025
Same author

Distribution of attention in three-dimensional space.

Neuropsychologia·2025
Same author

Peri-operative management of Ozempic and other GLP-1 agonists during cosmetic surgery: What plastic surgeons need to know.

Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS·2024
Same journal

EXPRESS: Age-related Differences in Recognition Memory for Discourse: The Case of Modified Words, Competitors, and Related Lures.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

EXPRESS: Exaggerated Self-Referencing in Body Dysmorphic Disorder.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

EXPRESS: Post-Error Adjustments: The role of Response Stimulus Intervals and error placement.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

Mitigating the Low Prevalence Effect: Role of Removing Explicit "Target-Absent" Responses in Visual Search.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

Visual Selection Is Spatially Constrained During Working Memory Consolidation.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same journal

Cross-Phoneme Generalisation of Dimension-Based Statistical Learning for Stop Voicing: Probing Subject Design and Word Frame Effects.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 23, 2026

Examining Bilingual Language Control Using the Stroop Task
05:31

Examining Bilingual Language Control Using the Stroop Task

Published on: February 26, 2020

Context-specific control and the Stroop negative priming effect.

Bruce Milliken1, David R Thomson, Karmen Bleile

  • 1Department of Psychology, Neuroscience & Behavior, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. millike@mcmaster.ca

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006)
|April 17, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Context-specific learning influences negative priming effects. Rapid learning processes integrate past experiences with current perception, showing how probe selection impacts cognitive priming.

More Related Videos

Training Synesthetic Letter-color Associations by Reading in Color
10:27

Training Synesthetic Letter-color Associations by Reading in Color

Published on: February 20, 2014

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking
05:58

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 23, 2026

Examining Bilingual Language Control Using the Stroop Task
05:31

Examining Bilingual Language Control Using the Stroop Task

Published on: February 26, 2020

Training Synesthetic Letter-color Associations by Reading in Color
10:27

Training Synesthetic Letter-color Associations by Reading in Color

Published on: February 20, 2014

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking
05:58

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Experimental Psychology

Background:

  • Negative priming effects often depend on probe selection.
  • Understanding this dependence is crucial for cognitive models of attention and memory.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the role of context-specific learning in negative priming.
  • To examine how different probe types (selection vs. no-selection) and repetition proportions interact with learning.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a Stroop priming procedure across four experiments.
  • Manipulated probe selection (between-subjects and within-subject) and proportion repeated.
  • Varied intertrial intervals to assess temporal effects on priming.

Main Results:

  • Stroop priming effects differed qualitatively based on probe selection when manipulated between subjects.
  • A context-specific proportion repeated effect was observed, causing quantitative shifts.
  • Qualitative changes in priming (negative to positive) occurred with altered repetition proportions in no-selection probes.

Conclusions:

  • Demonstrates the utility of context-specific learning in explaining priming phenomena.
  • Highlights the dynamic integration of prior experiences and current perception.
  • Suggests rapid, context-specific learning underlies observed priming effects.