Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 17, 2026

Comprehensive & Cost Effective Laboratory Monitoring of HIV/AIDS: an African Role Model
Published on: October 31, 2010
Auditing national HIV guidelines and policies: The United Kingdom CD4 Surveillance Scheme
Alison E Brown1, Meaghan M Kall, Ruth D Smith
1Health Protection Agency, Colindale, 61 Colindale Avenue, London, NW9 5EQ, UK.
Insights
The UK
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Epidemiology
- Immunology
Background:
- The United Kingdom's CD4 surveillance scheme is a vital national resource for monitoring HIV.
- It supports the auditing of national HIV testing, treatment, and care guidelines.
- The scheme provides crucial data for public health policy development.
Purpose of the Study:
- To demonstrate the utility of the UK CD4 surveillance scheme through four key outputs.
- To analyze trends in CD4 counts at HIV diagnosis and their implications.
- To assess the impact of surveillance data on HIV care and treatment adherence.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of national CD4 count data from HIV patients in the UK.
- Calculation of median CD4 counts at diagnosis and rates of late diagnosis.
- Assessment of time to first CD4 count and initiation of anti-retroviral therapy (ARV).
Main Results:
- In 2009, 95% of diagnosed adults had available CD4 counts.
- Median CD4 count at diagnosis increased from 276 to 335 cells/mm³ (2000-2009).
- 52% of patients were diagnosed late (CD4 <350 cells/mm³), with a tenfold higher mortality risk.
- 61% met the target for CD4 count within 14 days of diagnosis (2008).
- 83% of patients with CD4 <350 cells/mm³ received ARV.
Conclusions:
- CD4 count monitoring is critical for UK HIV surveillance.
- The scheme effectively monitors efforts to reduce HIV-related morbidity and mortality.
- Surveillance data supports auditing of public health policies and guidelines at national and local levels.
Abstract:
The United Kingdom's CD4 surveillance scheme monitors CD4 cell counts among HIV patients and is a national resource for HIV surveillance. It has driven public health policy and allowed auditing of national HIV testing, treatment and care guidelines. WE DEMONSTRATE ITS UTILITY THROUGH FOUR EXAMPLE OUTPUTS: median CD4 count at HIV diagnosis; late HIV diagnosis and short-term mortality; the timing of first CD4 count to indicate entry into HIV care; and the proportion of patients with CD4 counts <350 cells/mm3 receiving anti-retroviral therapy (ARV). In 2009, 95% (61,502/64,420) of adults living with diagnosed HIV infection had CD4 counts available. The median CD4 count at diagnosis increased from 276 to 335 cells/mm3 between 2000 and 2009, indicating modest improvements in HIV testing. In 2009, 52% of patients were diagnosed at a late stage of HIV infection (CD4 <350 cells/mm(3)); these individuals had a ten-fold risk of dying within a year of their diagnosis compared to those diagnosed promptly. In 2008, the national target of performing a CD4 count within 14 days of diagnosis was met for 61% of patients. National treatment guidelines have largely been met with 83% patients with CD4 <350 cells/mm(3) receiving ARV. The monitoring of CD4 counts is critical to HIV surveillance in the United Kingdom enabling the close monitoring of efforts to reduce morbidity and mortality associated with late diagnosis and underpins the auditing of policies and guidelines. These routine surveillance outputs can be generated at national and local levels to drive and monitor public health policy and prevention efforts.
Related Concept Videos
Principles of Disease Surveillance
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: Affecting Factors

