Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 17, 2026

Neuronavigated Focalized Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Administered During Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Published on: November 15, 2024
Inter-Individual Variation during Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Normalization of Dose Using MRI-Derived
Abhishek Datta1, Dennis Truong, Preet Minhas
1Neural Engineering Laboratory, Department of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of City University of New York New York, NY, USA ; Soterix Medical New York, NY, USA.
Subject-specific modeling of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) can improve treatment consistency. Computational models reveal anatomical variations influence current flow, highlighting the need for personalized tDCS dosing for better efficacy.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Biomedical Engineering
Background:
- Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive neuromodulation technique used for neuropsychiatric disorders, rehabilitation, and cognitive enhancement.
- Variability in tDCS response is a challenge, potentially due to differences in applied current intensity influenced by electrode montage and individual anatomy.
- Computational Finite Element Method (FEM) simulations using subject-specific MRI data are crucial for predicting brain current flow.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the variability of current flow in the brain during tDCS across different anatomical individuals.
- To model multiple tDCS montages in typical adults to understand inter-individual differences in current distribution.
- To explore methods for normalizing tDCS dose by customizing it to individual anatomy.
Main Methods:
- Modeling of multiple tDCS montages in three adult subjects (ages 34-41).
- Utilizing computational FEM simulations based on subject-specific anatomical MRI data.
- Comparison of conventional pad stimulation and High-Definition tDCS (HD-tDCS) montages.
Main Results:
- Conventional tDCS resulted in diffuse current modulation, with peak flow between electrodes, varying in intensity and location across subjects.
- HD-tDCS demonstrated more restricted current flow within the electrode perimeter for all subjects.
- Individual cortical anatomy, including gyri and sulci, significantly influenced the current flow profile for both stimulation types.
Conclusions:
- Subject-specific modeling is essential for predicting and understanding tDCS current flow.
- Customizing tDCS dose based on individual anatomy can lead to more consistent and effective neuromodulation.
- This approach holds promise for optimizing tDCS therapy for various applications.
More Related Videos
07:20Stimulation Location Determination using a 3D Digitizer with High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
Published on: December 20, 2019
08:29Standardized Induction and Assessment of Long-term Potentiation-like Cortical Plasticity Using Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Published on: November 7, 2025