Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 17, 2026

Closure of a Patent Foramen Ovale (PFO): An Intervention Sequence
Published on: December 23, 2022
AMPLATZER Septal Occluder failure resulting in paradoxical cerebral embolism
Rajeev R Fernando1, Ketan P Koranne, Colin M Barker
1Division of Cardiology, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas 77030, USA. rajeev.fernando@uth.tmc.edu
Insights
Patent foramen ovale and atrial septal defects increase stroke risk. A rare case shows delayed AMPLATZER Septal Occluder dysfunction causing paradoxical embolism years after closure.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Neurology
- Medical Devices
Background:
- Patent foramen ovale and atrial septal defects are known risk factors for paradoxical embolism and cerebral ischemic events.
- Transcatheter closure is a common treatment for atrial septal defects, offering an alternative to surgery.
- Residual shunting post-closure is linked to increased risk of recurrent ischemic events.
Observation:
- A 60-year-old woman with Ebstein anomaly and recurrent strokes presented with new infarcts and paradoxical embolism.
- This occurred 3 years after transcatheter closure of an atrial septal defect using an AMPLATZER Septal Occluder.
- Imaging revealed a right-to-left shunt through a displaced occluder device.
Findings:
- The displaced AMPLATZER Septal Occluder allowed for a persistent right-to-left shunt, leading to paradoxical embolism.
- Pulmonary hypertension, right ventricular failure, and right atrial dilation may have contributed to the device dysfunction and shunting.
- This represents a rare instance of delayed device dysfunction after transcatheter atrial septal defect closure.
Implications:
- Delayed dysfunction of septal occluder devices, though rare, can lead to serious thromboembolic complications.
- This case highlights the importance of long-term monitoring for patients with septal occluder devices, especially those with complex cardiac conditions.
- Further research into device longevity and risk factors for delayed dysfunction is warranted.
Abstract:
Patent foramen ovale and atrial septal defect are risk factors for paradoxical embolism and subsequent cerebral ischemic events. The transseptal passage of emboli from the right to the left cardiac chambers appears to play an important role. The therapeutic options are medical therapy (anti-aggregation or anticoagulation), surgical closure, or transcatheter closure. Transcatheter closure of atrial septal defects affords the advantage of closing an atrial defect without the associated morbidity of open-heart surgery and the bleeding sequelae of oral anticoagulation. After closure, however, the presence of a residual shunt is independently associated with an increased risk of recurrent ischemic events. Newer devices, such as the AMPLATZER Septal Occluder, have decreased the risk of residual shunting and thromboembolic events. In addition, they have a very low risk of device dislodgement, migration, and embolization.We describe the case of a 60-year-old woman with Ebstein anomaly and recurrent ischemic strokes who presented with acute ischemic infarcts and paradoxical embolism 3 years after undergoing transcatheter closure of an atrial septal defect. A right-to-left shunt through a displaced AMPLATZER Septal Occluder was detected. Pulmonary hypertension and resultant right ventricular failure and right atrial dilation could have contributed to the persistent shunting and paradoxical embolism.To our knowledge, the delayed dysfunction of an AMPLATZER Septal Occluder has not been reported. In addition to describing the patient's case, we review the relevant medical literature.
Related Concept Videos
Pulmonary Embolism I: Introduction
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
