Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 14, 2026

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Multiple Sclerosis at 7.0 Tesla
Published on: February 19, 2021
Interrelating sentinel event alert #38 with the ACR guidance document on MR safe practices: 2013. An MRI
1Mednovus, Inc. & RADIOLOGY-Planning, Overland Park, Kansas 66213, USA. tgilk@rad-planning.com
Abstract:
When, in 2008, the Joint Commission released its Sentinel Event Alert #38 regarding MRI safety, it joined the ACR's Guidance Document on MR Safe Practices as one of two radiology best-practice documents establishing MR safety protections. However, particularly for MR providers who held both modality-level accreditation from the ACR, and enterprise-level accreditation from the Joint Commission, there has been confusion about which institution's standard takes precedence, or whether there are inherent conflicts between the two. With the release of the 2013 update to the ACR Guidance Document on MR Safe Practices, the authors have cross-referenced the performance criteria of both MR safety standards, and correlated the ACR Guidance Document performance criteria with the Joint Commission's Environment of Care standards.
Insights
This study compares MRI safety standards from the Joint Commission and the American College of Radiology (ACR). It clarifies which MRI safety guidelines take precedence for providers accredited by both organizations.
Area of Science:
- Radiology and Medical Imaging
- Healthcare Accreditation and Quality Improvement
Background:
- The Joint Commission's Sentinel Event Alert #38 (2008) and the American College of Radiology's (ACR) Guidance Document on MR Safe Practices are key MRI safety standards.
- Healthcare providers with accreditation from both the Joint Commission and the ACR face confusion regarding the precedence and potential conflicts between these two sets of MRI safety standards.
Framework:
- This analysis cross-references the performance criteria of the ACR's 2013 Guidance Document on MR Safe Practices with the Joint Commission's Environment of Care standards.
- The study correlates specific ACR guidance performance criteria with corresponding Joint Commission Environment of Care standards to identify alignment and discrepancies.
Implementation:
- The research provides a comparative analysis of the two major MRI safety accreditation frameworks.
- It aims to resolve ambiguities for healthcare providers accredited by both the ACR and the Joint Commission.
Implications:
- Clarifies the hierarchy and integration of MRI safety standards for accredited healthcare facilities.
- Aims to reduce confusion and enhance compliance with best practices in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) safety.
- Supports improved patient safety and operational efficiency in MRI environments by harmonizing accreditation requirements.
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies I: CT and MRI
Description of the Procedures
Computed Tomography (CT) scan:
Computed Tomography (CT) scans use X-ray technology to generate detailed images of bones, organs, and tissues. During the scan, the patient lies on a moving table...
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System IV: CMRI
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Imaging Studies IV: Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Guidelines and Strategies for Safe Computer Charting
Maintain Confidentiality and Security:
Types of Reports II: Incident or Occurrence Report
Purposes:
In the healthcare industry, reports play a crucial role in documenting incidents within an agency. The primary objective of these reports is to ensure patient safety, uphold the...
