Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 12, 2026

Trabecular Meshwork Response to Pressure Elevation in the Living Human Eye
Published on: June 20, 2015
Corneal biomechanical properties affect Goldmann applanation tonometry in primary open-angle glaucoma
Bryan R Costin1, Gloria P Fleming, Paul A Weber
1*Department of Ophthalmology, William H. Havener Eye Institute, The Ohio State University Medical Center †Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
Primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) corneas are softer, leading to greater underestimation of intraocular pressure (IOP) by Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) compared to newer methods, independent of central corneal thickness (CCT). This impacts POAG treatment decisions.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Biomechanical Engineering
- Glaucoma Research
Background:
- Primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) is a leading cause of irreversible blindness.
- Accurate intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement is critical for POAG diagnosis and management.
- Corneal properties significantly influence IOP readings, necessitating investigation into their role in POAG.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate differences in corneal biomechanical properties between POAG patients and normal controls.
- To assess the impact of these biomechanical differences on intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements obtained by various tonometry methods.
- To determine if central corneal thickness (CCT)-matched controls adequately account for biomechanical variations in POAG.
Main Methods:
- Corneal topography, Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT), dynamic contour tonometry (DCT), and corneal-compensated IOP (IOPcc) were performed.
- Corneal hysteresis and central corneal thickness (CCT) were measured using the Reichert ocular response analyzer (ORA).
- Data from 13 POAG eyes and 15 control eyes were compared using t tests.
Main Results:
- POAG subjects exhibited significantly lower corneal hysteresis compared to controls.
- The magnitude of difference between GAT and DCT/IOPcc (delta differences) was significantly greater in POAG eyes.
- Mean DCT and IOPcc values were significantly different between POAG and control groups, unlike mean GAT IOP.
Conclusions:
- Corneal biomechanical properties, specifically lower corneal hysteresis, are significantly different in POAG patients compared to controls, independent of CCT.
- Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) may underestimate IOP more significantly in POAG patients due to these biomechanical differences.
- These findings suggest that standard IOP measurements may require adjustment in POAG management, potentially influencing treatment decisions and patient outcomes.
Related Concept Videos
Open Angle Glaucoma: Treatment
Drugs such as carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, α2- and...
Glaucoma: Overview
Angle Closure Glaucoma: Treatment
