Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Network Covalent Solids02:18

Network Covalent Solids

Network covalent solids contain a three-dimensional network of covalently bonded atoms as found in the crystal structures of nonmetals like diamond, graphite, silicon, and some covalent compounds, such as silicon dioxide (sand) and silicon carbide (carborundum, the abrasive on sandpaper). Many minerals have networks of covalent bonds.
To break or to melt a covalent network solid, covalent bonds must be broken. Because covalent bonds are relatively strong, covalent network solids are typically...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

MyoD- and FoxO3-mediated hotspot interaction orchestrates super-enhancer activity during myogenic differentiation.

Nucleic acids research·2017
Same author

Tensile strength suppresses the osteogenesis of periodontal ligament cells in inflammatory microenvironments.

Molecular medicine reports·2017
Same author

A PDGFB mutation causes paroxysmal nonkinesigenic dyskinesia with brain calcification.

Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society·2017
Same author

A Molecular Switch Regulating Cell Fate Choice between Muscle Progenitor Cells and Brown Adipocytes.

Developmental cell·2017
Same author

Microarray analysis of differentially expressed genes and their functions in omental visceral adipose tissues of pregnant women with vs. without gestational diabetes mellitus.

Biomedical reports·2017
Same author

Development and validation of a simplified titration method for monitoring volatile fatty acids in anaerobic digestion.

Waste management (New York, N.Y.)·2017
Same journal

Enriching Magneto-Optical Functionalities in Iron Garnet Films via Compensation-Driven Magnetic Tuning.

Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.)·2026
Same journal

Quartz-Like Supramolecular Glass Enabled by Host-Guest Size Mismatch.

Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.)·2026
Same journal

Reliable and Reusable All-Solid-State Contact-Type Pre-Lithiation Platform for High-Performance All-Solid-State Batteries.

Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.)·2026
Same journal

Cross-Scale Design of Electrocatalytic Systems for Steering Alcohol Oxidation Toward High-Value-Added Chemicals.

Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.)·2026
Same journal

Synergistic Control of Radiative Decay and Exciton Splitting Dynamics for Efficient Organic Solar Cells Processed by Non-Halogenated Solvent.

Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.)·2026
Same journal

Nitrogen-Incorporated Silicon Dioxide Interlayer Enables Pinhole-Reduced and Robust TOPCon With a High Implied Open-Circuit Voltage over 760 mV.

Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 10, 2026

Manufacturing of Three-dimensionally Microstructured Nanocomposites through Microfluidic Infiltration
14:24

Manufacturing of Three-dimensionally Microstructured Nanocomposites through Microfluidic Infiltration

Published on: March 12, 2014

Developing polymer composite materials: carbon nanotubes or graphene?

Xuemei Sun1, Hao Sun, Houpu Li

  • 1State Key Laboratory of Molecular Engineering of Polymers, Department of Macromolecular Science and Laboratory of Advanced Materials, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200438, China.

Advanced Materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.)
|July 2, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This review compares polymer composites using carbon nanotubes and graphene, highlighting their distinct properties and applications. Understanding these differences is key to developing advanced materials.

Keywords:
carbon nanotubescompositesgraphenepolymers

More Related Videos

Functionalization and Dispersion of Carbon Nanomaterials Using an Environmentally Friendly Ultrasonicated Ozonolysis Process
08:33

Functionalization and Dispersion of Carbon Nanomaterials Using an Environmentally Friendly Ultrasonicated Ozonolysis Process

Published on: May 30, 2017

Strain Sensing Based on Multiscale Composite Materials Reinforced with Graphene Nanoplatelets
09:38

Strain Sensing Based on Multiscale Composite Materials Reinforced with Graphene Nanoplatelets

Published on: November 7, 2016

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 10, 2026

Manufacturing of Three-dimensionally Microstructured Nanocomposites through Microfluidic Infiltration
14:24

Manufacturing of Three-dimensionally Microstructured Nanocomposites through Microfluidic Infiltration

Published on: March 12, 2014

Functionalization and Dispersion of Carbon Nanomaterials Using an Environmentally Friendly Ultrasonicated Ozonolysis Process
08:33

Functionalization and Dispersion of Carbon Nanomaterials Using an Environmentally Friendly Ultrasonicated Ozonolysis Process

Published on: May 30, 2017

Strain Sensing Based on Multiscale Composite Materials Reinforced with Graphene Nanoplatelets
09:38

Strain Sensing Based on Multiscale Composite Materials Reinforced with Graphene Nanoplatelets

Published on: November 7, 2016

Area of Science:

  • Materials Science
  • Polymer Science
  • Nanotechnology

Background:

  • Composite materials enhance polymer performance and applications.
  • Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) and graphene are widely used nanofillers due to their exceptional properties.
  • Both CNTs and graphene offer unique advantages but differ in synthesis, structure control, and polymer interaction.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the preparation, structure, properties, and applications of polymer composites based on CNTs and graphene.
  • To emphasize the key differences between CNT- and graphene-based polymer composites.
  • To summarize strategies for developing advanced polymer composite materials.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of scientific publications on CNT and graphene polymer composites.
  • Comparative analysis of synthesis methods, structural characteristics, and property profiles.
  • Discussion of application-specific performance and material design strategies.

Main Results:

  • CNTs and graphene impart distinct properties to polymer matrices.
  • Differences in synthesis and structure control lead to varied composite performance.
  • Tailoring composite properties requires understanding the specific interactions between the nanofiller and polymer.

Conclusions:

  • CNTs and graphene offer complementary but distinct pathways for creating high-performance polymer composites.
  • Strategic selection and processing are crucial for optimizing composite properties for specific applications.
  • Further research into filler-matrix interactions can unlock new material possibilities.