Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Random Error01:04

Random Error

Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Errors in Global Positioning System01:26

Errors in Global Positioning System

Global Positioning System (GPS) technology has revolutionized navigation and positioning, but its accuracy is often compromised by various errors. These errors, stemming from environmental, satellite, and receiver-related factors, require careful mitigation to ensure reliable performance across applications.Atmospheric ErrorsGPS signals travel through the Earth’s ionosphere and troposphere, introducing delays which affect accuracy. The ionosphere is strongly influenced by charged particles,...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

In search of common ground: Exploring value networks at the UNFCCC climate change talks.

Network science (Cambridge University Press)·2026
Same author

Does demography have a role in measuring homelessness? Insights and approaches in the United States.

Vienna yearbook of population research·2026
Same author

Dynamic Networks of Negotiation for International Climate Change Cooperation.

Environmental sociology·2025
Same author

Encampments as neighbors: Encampment location and proximity to amenities among Seattle, WA's unhoused population.

Cities (London, England)·2025
Same author

Endogenous competition and the underrealized reproduction of infectious diseases.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same author

Recommendations for sharing network data and materials.

Network science (Cambridge University Press)·2025
Same journal

Neighborhood Shocks and Network Dynamics: An Instrumental Variable Approach to Measuring Triadic Closure in Daily Mobility Networks.

Social networks·2026
Same journal

A Hybrid Mixed Methods Design for Understanding Decision Making, Social Structure, and Network Dynamics of Life Course Transitions.

Social networks·2026
Same journal

Network threats to causal inference: Variations in network position by participation in randomized controlled trials.

Social networks·2026
Same journal

Understanding the Personal Networks of People Experiencing Homelessness in King County, WA with Aggregate Relational Data.

Social networks·2026
Same journal

Beyond weak ties in prison: An investigation of core support networks of incarcerated persons.

Social networks·2026
Same journal

Friends Forever? Correlates of High School Friendship (In)stability from Adolescence to Young Adulthood.

Social networks·2025
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 9, 2026

Modeling the Functional Network for Spatial Navigation in the Human Brain
05:55

Modeling the Functional Network for Spatial Navigation in the Human Brain

Published on: October 13, 2023

Random errors in egocentric networks.

Zack W Almquist1

  • 1Department of Sociology, University of California, Irvine, 3151 Social Science Plaza A, Irvine, CA 92697-5100, United States.

Social Networks
|July 24, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Random errors in egocentric network analysis can significantly distort network properties and regression parameters. Even moderate error rates (5-20%) in ego network data lead to substantial misestimations, impacting research findings.

Keywords:
Egocentric networkEgonetErrorFacebookNetwork error

More Related Videos

Dynamic Digital Biomarkers of Motor and Cognitive Function in Parkinson's Disease
10:28

Dynamic Digital Biomarkers of Motor and Cognitive Function in Parkinson's Disease

Published on: July 24, 2019

A Naturalistic Setup for Presenting Real People and Live Actions in Experimental Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience Studies
07:43

A Naturalistic Setup for Presenting Real People and Live Actions in Experimental Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience Studies

Published on: August 4, 2023

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 9, 2026

Modeling the Functional Network for Spatial Navigation in the Human Brain
05:55

Modeling the Functional Network for Spatial Navigation in the Human Brain

Published on: October 13, 2023

Dynamic Digital Biomarkers of Motor and Cognitive Function in Parkinson's Disease
10:28

Dynamic Digital Biomarkers of Motor and Cognitive Function in Parkinson's Disease

Published on: July 24, 2019

A Naturalistic Setup for Presenting Real People and Live Actions in Experimental Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience Studies
07:43

A Naturalistic Setup for Presenting Real People and Live Actions in Experimental Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience Studies

Published on: August 4, 2023

Area of Science:

  • Social network analysis
  • Sociology
  • Computational social science

Background:

  • Egocentric network analysis traditionally focuses on systematic errors from human memory and survey design.
  • Random error analysis in egocentric networks remains understudied.
  • Existing research lacks a comprehensive understanding of how random errors impact network measures and statistical models.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the effects of random errors on egocentric network analysis.
  • To investigate the impact of using egocentric network measures as predictors in linear models.
  • To quantify the consequences of false-positive and false-negative errors in egocentric network data.

Main Methods:

  • Simulation analysis using a ground truth egocentric network dataset derived from Facebook friendships.
  • Examination of standard network measures under varying error rates.
  • Assessment of linear models incorporating egocentric network measures with simulated errors.

Main Results:

  • Moderate error rates (5-20%), common in ego network data, significantly misestimate network properties.
  • The presence of random errors leads to substantial misestimation of regression parameters when using egonet measures as predictors.
  • Both false-positive and false-negative errors demonstrably impact egocentric network analysis and subsequent statistical modeling.

Conclusions:

  • Random errors pose a significant threat to the validity of egocentric network analysis and associated statistical inferences.
  • Researchers must account for potential random errors in ego network data to avoid misleading conclusions.
  • Future research should focus on developing methods to mitigate or correct for random errors in egocentric network studies.