Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 9, 2026

08:24
The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
Temporal reproductions are influenced by an internal reference: explaining the Vierordt effect
Karin M Bausenhart1, Oliver Dyjas1, Rolf Ulrich1
1University of Tübingen, Germany.
Acta Psychologica
|July 31, 2013
Summary
Our study reveals that time perception relies on a dynamic internal reference, integrating past and present duration information. This mechanism explains the Vierordt effect, where short intervals are overestimated and long ones underestimated.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Neuroscience
- Psychophysics
Background:
- Duration perception literature suggests reliance on internal time memory.
- A recent account proposes a dynamic updating process for this internal reference.
- The classical Vierordt effect (over/underestimation of temporal intervals) remains unresolved.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate a dynamic mechanism for time perception.
- To explain the unresolved Vierordt effect using this mechanism.
- To examine predictions of a dynamically updated internal reference model.
Main Methods:
- Conducted a temporal reproduction experiment.
- Participants reproduced standard (constant duration) and comparison (variable duration) stimuli.
- Analyzed reproduction accuracy influenced by stimulus temporal position and prior trials.
Main Results:
- Reproductions were influenced by the temporal position of the stimulus.
- Reproductions were also affected by stimuli presented on earlier trials.
- These findings support a dynamically updated internal reference for time judgments.
Conclusions:
- A dynamically updated internal reference underlies time judgments.
- This dynamic mechanism likely explains the Vierordt effect.
- The study provides evidence for continuous integration of temporal information.
Related Concept Videos
Nonconscious Mimicry
Nonconscious mimicry occurs when individuals alter their mannerisms to match the behaviors and expressions of those nearby, without intention.
Framing Effects
Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in different ways based on the...
Actor-Observer Effect
The actor-observer effect, a cognitive bias closely linked to the fundamental attribution error, refers to the tendency for individuals to attribute their behavior to external, situational factors while explaining others’ behavior in terms of internal, dispositional traits. This asymmetry in attribution significantly influences social perception and judgment.Cognitive Mechanisms Behind the EffectTwo primary psychological mechanisms contribute to the actor-observer effect: differences in visual...
Hindsight Biases
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now?
Reason and Intuition
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the brain can only use...
Social Loafing
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated, individuals become less...

