Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 8, 2026

Fabrication of Amyloid-β-Secreting Alginate Microbeads for Use in Modelling Alzheimer's Disease
Published on: July 6, 2019
Surface adsorption considerations when working with amyloid fibrils in multiwell plates and Eppendorf tubes
Amber N Murray1, Fernando L Palhano, Jan Bieschke
1Department of Chemistry and the Skaggs Institute for Chemical Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California, 92037; Department of Molecular and Experimental Medicine and the Skaggs Institute for Chemical Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California, 92037.
Previous studies incorrectly interpreted amyloid-beta (Aβ) fibril disaggregation. Fibril loss was due to adsorption to plastic surfaces, not disaggregase activity in biological extracts.
Area of Science:
- Biochemistry
- Molecular Biology
- Neuroscience
Background:
- Amyloid diseases are characterized by the accumulation of cross-β-sheet amyloid fibrils.
- Previous research suggested amyloid disaggregase activities in mammalian and C. elegans extracts.
- A re-evaluation of prior findings revealed a potential misinterpretation of experimental data.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the cause of apparent amyloid-beta (Aβ) fibril disaggregation observed in previous studies.
- To determine the role of plastic surface adsorption in the loss of Aβ fibrils in the presence of biological extracts.
- To correct previously published findings regarding Aβ disaggregase activity.
Main Methods:
- Quantification of Aβ fibril adsorption to plastic and quartz surfaces.
- Analysis of thioflavin T fluorescence in the presence of biological extracts under denaturing conditions.
- Comparison of experimental results with previously published data.
Main Results:
- Aβ fibrils significantly adsorb to plastic surfaces (multiwell plates, Eppendorf tubes).
- Adsorption is enhanced by biological mixtures subjected to denaturing air-water interfaces.
- The observed loss of thioflavin T fluorescence was attributed to increased Aβ adsorption, not disaggregation.
Conclusions:
- The interpretation of kinetic fibril disaggregation assays in prior publications is invalid.
- Previously reported disaggregase activity in worm or mammalian cell extracts is not supported by this re-evaluation.
- Two prior publications are corrected, and an apology is extended for the misinterpretation of data.
