Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 6, 2026

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm
Published on: May 14, 2014
You better stop! Binding "stop" tags to irrelevant stimulus features.
Carina Giesen1, Klaus Rothermund
1a Department of Psychology , Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena , Jena , Germany.
Irrelevant stimulus features can become linked to a "stop" signal, influencing future responses. This "stop" tag appears to be global, affecting all actions rather than specific ones.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive psychology
- Neuroscience
- Human behavior
Background:
- Stimulus-response integration is a fundamental cognitive process.
- Understanding how this process is modulated by inhibition is crucial for cognitive control research.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate if stimulus-response integration extends to situations involving response inhibition.
- To determine if irrelevant stimulus features associate with a "stop" tag.
Main Methods:
- Utilized a stop-signal task combined with a sequential priming paradigm.
- Three experiments examined the effects of repeating irrelevant stimulus features across prime and probe trials.
Main Results:
- Stopping a response during a prime trial led to delayed responding and facilitated stopping in a subsequent probe trial when the same stimulus feature reappeared.
- These repetition priming effects were observed regardless of the response type, suggesting global inhibition.
Conclusions:
- Irrelevant stimulus features can become globally associated with response inhibition.
- "Stop" tags appear to be general commands to inhibit all responses, not specific ones.
Related Concept Videos
Feedback Inhibition
Desensitization and Tachyphylaxis
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic
Cooperative Binding of Transcription Regulators
Cooperative Binding of Transcription Regulators
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...

