Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 6, 2026

04:52
Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations
Published on: February 3, 2023
1.2K
Performance of standard and stochastic branch-site models for detecting positive selection among coding sequences
1Department of Statistics, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Molecular Biology and Evolution
|October 18, 2013
Summary
The standard branch-site model is best for confirming positive selection when lineage information is known. A newer stochastic approach is better for exploratory studies when this prior knowledge is absent or incorrect.
Area of Science:
- Evolutionary biology
- Molecular evolution
- Phylogenetics
Background:
- The standard branch-site model analyzes natural selection on coding sequences but requires prior knowledge of lineages under selection.
- This prior information is often unavailable, limiting the standard model's applicability in evolutionary studies.
- A stochastic branch-site model was developed to handle variability in selection patterns without prior lineage information.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the performance of the standard and stochastic branch-site models in detecting positive selection.
- To assess the sensitivity and specificity of both models using extensive simulations.
- To evaluate their utility in different scenarios, particularly when prior lineage information is known or unknown.
Main Methods:
- Extensive simulations were conducted to compare the standard and stochastic branch-site models.
- Sensitivity and specificity of tests for positive selection were evaluated under various conditions.
- Comparisons were made against the mixed-effects model of evolution.
Main Results:
- Both models exhibit low Type I error rates, being conservative under neutral or negative selection.
- The standard model is more powerful when prior lineage information is accurate.
- The stochastic model outperforms the standard model when prior lineage information is incorrect or unavailable.
Conclusions:
- The standard branch-site model is suitable for confirmatory analyses requiring known foreground lineages.
- The stochastic branch-site model is preferable for exploratory studies, especially when prior lineage information is uncertain.
- The stochastic approach shows advantages over the standard and mixed-effects models in exploratory contexts.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Significance Testing: Overview
10.2K
Significance testing is a set of statistical methods used to test whether a claim about a parameter is valid. In analytical chemistry, significance testing is used primarily to determine whether the difference between two values comes from determinate or random errors. The effect of a particular change in the measurement protocol, analyst, or sample itself can cause a deviation from the expected result. In the case of a suspected deviation/outlier, we need to be able to confirm mathematically...
10.2K
Frequency-dependent Selection
20.2K
When the fitness of a trait is influenced by how common it is (i.e., its frequency) relative to different traits within a population, this is referred to as frequency-dependent selection. Frequency-dependent selection may occur between species or within a single species. This type of selection can either be positive—with more common phenotypes having higher fitness—or negative, with rarer phenotypes conferring increased fitness.
20.2K
Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs
11.6K
Sequencing of the human genome has opened up several best-kept secrets of the genome. Scientists have identified thousands of genome variations that exist within a population. These variations can be a single nucleotide or a larger chromosomal variation.
Copy number variations or CNVs are the structural variations that cover more than 1kb of DNA sequence. The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), on the other hand, is a single nucleotide change or a point mutation that is found in more than 1%...
Copy number variations or CNVs are the structural variations that cover more than 1kb of DNA sequence. The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), on the other hand, is a single nucleotide change or a point mutation that is found in more than 1%...
11.6K
Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?
6.2K
The genomes of eukaryotes are punctuated by long stretches of sequence which do not code for proteins or RNAs. Although some of these regions do contain crucial regulatory sequences, the vast majority of this DNA serves no known function. Typically, these regions of the genome are the ones in which the fastest change, in evolutionary terms, is observed, because there is typically little to no selection pressure acting on these regions to preserve their sequences.
In contrast, regions which code...
In contrast, regions which code...
6.2K
Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?
2.5K
2.5K
Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms-SNPs
15.1K
A single nucleotide polymorphism or SNP is a single nucleotide variation at a specific genomic position in a large population. It is the most prevalent type of sequence variation found in the human genome. Point mutations that occur in more than 1% of the population qualify as SNPs. These are present once every 1000 nucleotides on an average in the human genome. Replacement of a purine with another purine (A/G) or a pyrimidine with another pyrimidine (C/T) is known as a transition. In contrast,...
15.1K

