Ethical issues in conducting research with deaf populations
Michael McKee1, Deirdre Schlehofer, Denise Thew
1Michael McKee is with the Department of Family Medicine and the National Center for Deaf Health Research, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY. Deirdre Schlehofer is with the Department of American Sign Language and Interpreting Education, National Technical Institute for the Deaf, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY. Denise Thew is with the Department of Public Health Science, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY.
Deaf American Sign Language (ASL) users face marginalization in research due to cultural and ethical challenges. This article proposes strategies for inclusive research, emphasizing community representation and collaboration to build trust.
Area of Science:
- Sociology of Health
- Bioethics
- Linguistic Anthropology
Background:
- Deaf American Sign Language (ASL) users are a marginalized population in research.
- Cultural differences in perceiving deafness (cultural identity vs. disability) create mistrust.
- Ethical issues include lack of community representation and accessible research materials.
Purpose of the Study:
- To address challenges faced by Deaf ASL users in research.
- To propose innovative strategies for inclusive research practices.
- To highlight the importance of community collaboration.
Main Methods:
- Literature review on cultural and ethical challenges in Deaf research.
- Analysis of community perspectives on research participation.
- Development of collaborative strategies for researchers.
Main Results:
- Identified key barriers to research participation for Deaf ASL users.
- Outlined specific strategies for community engagement and representation.
- Emphasized the need for accessible informed consent and research materials.
Conclusions:
- Community representation and collaboration are crucial for ethical research with Deaf ASL users.
- Addressing cultural and linguistic barriers can foster trust and improve research outcomes.
- Innovative strategies are needed to ensure equitable participation in scientific studies.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Ethics in Research
Barriers to Effective Communication II
Cultural barriers:
Differences in values, beliefs, religion, knowledge, and tradition can significantly impact communication. Awareness of nonverbal cues is critical, especially when conversing with a patient from a different culture. What appears appropriate in one culture may be inappropriate in another.
Semantic barriers:
As a result of their tendency to use...
Blind Procedures
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
Hearing
Barriers to Effective Communication I
Communication barriers include the following:
Physiological barriers: They are limitations caused by a person's health condition or disability, such as hearing loss, poor eyesight, illness, or unconsciousness. An example to overcome this...


