Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 4, 2026

06:13
Endoscopic Septoplasty with Limited Two-line Resection: Minimally Invasive Surgery for Septal Deviation
Published on: June 20, 2018
17.3K
Open versus closed rhinoplasty with primary cheiloplasty: a comparative study.
Madhulaxmi Marimuthu1, Krishnamurthy Bonanthaya2, Pritham Shetty2
1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Saveetha Dental College, 162 Poonamalle High Road, Vellapanchavadi, Chennai, 600 077 India.
Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery
|January 17, 2014
Summary
This study compared open and closed rhinoplasty techniques during primary unilateral cleft lip repair. Open rhinoplasty resulted in a statistically significant difference in alar base width compared to closed rhinoplasty after six months.
Area of Science:
- Plastic Surgery
- Craniofacial Surgery
- Pediatric Surgery
Background:
- Unilateral cleft lip nose deformity presents significant reconstructive challenges.
- The optimal timing and technique for primary rhinoplasty in conjunction with cleft lip repair are debated.
- Both open and closed rhinoplasty techniques are commonly employed.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the outcomes of open versus closed rhinoplasty techniques during primary unilateral cleft lip repair.
- To evaluate the efficacy and aesthetic results of two distinct surgical approaches.
- To provide data for optimizing surgical strategies in cleft lip and nose reconstruction.
Main Methods:
- A randomized controlled prospective study involving 36 patients with unilateral complete cleft lip and nose deformity.
- Patients were randomly assigned to undergo either open rhinoplasty (19 patients) or closed rhinoplasty (17 patients).
- Cleft lip repair utilized a modified Millard's rotation-advancement technique in both groups, with a 6-month follow-up for assessment.
Main Results:
- A statistically significant difference was observed in the alar base width between the open and closed rhinoplasty groups post-operatively.
- No other statistically significant differences were found in the assessed parameters between the two techniques.
- Quantitative and qualitative analyses were performed to evaluate surgical outcomes.
Conclusions:
- Open rhinoplasty may offer advantages in achieving specific alar base width modifications compared to the closed technique during primary unilateral cleft lip repair.
- Further research is warranted to explore long-term outcomes and refine surgical techniques for unilateral cleft lip nose deformities.
- The choice between open and closed rhinoplasty should consider specific patient needs and desired aesthetic outcomes.

