Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments02:46

Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments

37.6K
Counting is the type of measurement that is free from uncertainty, provided the number of objects being counted does not change during the process. Such measurements result in exact numbers. By counting the eggs in a carton, for instance, one can determine exactly how many eggs are there in the carton. Similarly, the numbers of defined quantities are also exact. For example, 1 foot is exactly 12 inches, 1 inch is exactly 2.54 centimeters, and 1 gram is exactly 0.001 kilograms. Quantities...
37.6K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

93.9K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
93.9K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

1.4K
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
1.4K
Uncertainty: Overview00:59

Uncertainty: Overview

1.6K
In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
1.6K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error00:59

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

1.9K
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
1.9K
The Uncertainty Principle04:08

The Uncertainty Principle

25.6K
Werner Heisenberg considered the limits of how accurately one can measure properties of an electron or other microscopic particles. He determined that there is a fundamental limit to how accurately one can measure both a particle’s position and its momentum simultaneously. The more accurate the measurement of the momentum of a particle is known, the less accurate the position at that time is known and vice versa. This is what is now called the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. He...
25.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Experimental Verification of Multicopy Activation of Genuine Multipartite Entanglement.

Physical review letters·2026
Same author

Optical Sensing near the Quantum Limit with Enhanced Dynamic Range by Resolving the Spectra of Interfering Photons.

Physical review letters·2026
Same author

A large-scale reconfigurable multiplexed quantum photonic network.

Nature photonics·2026
Same author

Tunnelling photons challenge interpretation of quantum mechanics.

Nature·2025
Same author

Simulating two-dimensional lattice gauge theories on a qudit quantum computer.

Nature physics·2025
Same author

Verifiable measurement-based quantum random sampling with trapped ions.

Nature communications·2025
Same journal

Erratum: Bacterial Turbulence at Compressible Fluid Interfaces [Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 138301 (2026)].

Physical review letters·2026
Same journal

Unveiling Light-Quark Yukawa Flavor Structure via Dihadron Fragmentation at Lepton Colliders.

Physical review letters·2026
Same journal

Adaptable Route to Fast Coherent State Transport via Bang-Bang-Bang Protocols.

Physical review letters·2026
Same journal

Topological Transition and Emergence of Elasticity of Dislocation in Skyrmion Lattice: Beyond Kittel's Magnetic-Polar Analogy.

Physical review letters·2026
Same journal

Pound-Drever-Hall Method for Superconducting-Qubit Readout.

Physical review letters·2026
Same journal

Coupling a ^{73}Ge Nuclear Spin to an Electrostatically Defined Quantum Dot in Silicon.

Physical review letters·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 3, 2026

Measurement of Quantum Interference in a Silicon Ring Resonator Photon Source
12:19

Measurement of Quantum Interference in a Silicon Ring Resonator Photon Source

Published on: April 4, 2017

7.9K

Experimental joint quantum measurements with minimum uncertainty.

Martin Ringbauer1, Devon N Biggerstaff1, Matthew A Broome1

  • 1Centre for Engineered Quantum Systems, School of Mathematics and Physics, University of Queensland, Brisbane QLD 4072, Australia and Centre for Quantum Computer and Communication Technology, School of Mathematics and Physics, University of Queensland, Brisbane QLD 4072, Australia.

Physical Review Letters
|February 4, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Quantum physics limits how accurately we can measure incompatible properties simultaneously. This study tested these measurement-uncertainty relations using single photons, approaching fundamental precision limits.

More Related Videos

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements
10:22

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements

Published on: September 7, 2019

10.8K
Absolute Quantum Yield Measurement of Powder Samples
14:20

Absolute Quantum Yield Measurement of Powder Samples

Published on: May 12, 2012

29.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 3, 2026

Measurement of Quantum Interference in a Silicon Ring Resonator Photon Source
12:19

Measurement of Quantum Interference in a Silicon Ring Resonator Photon Source

Published on: April 4, 2017

7.9K
Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements
10:22

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements

Published on: September 7, 2019

10.8K
Absolute Quantum Yield Measurement of Powder Samples
14:20

Absolute Quantum Yield Measurement of Powder Samples

Published on: May 12, 2012

29.5K

Area of Science:

  • Quantum Physics
  • Quantum Measurement Theory

Background:

  • Quantum mechanics dictates fundamental limits on the precision of simultaneously measuring non-commuting observables.
  • Measurement-uncertainty relations quantify these inherent constraints, crucial for understanding quantum information processing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To experimentally test tight measurement-uncertainty relations for incompatible observables.
  • To evaluate the performance of established uncertainty-estimation methods under realistic conditions.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized single photons as the quantum system for measurements.
  • Implemented and adapted two theoretical methods: the three-state method and the weak-measurement method.
  • Assessed the impact of experimental imperfections on measurement uncertainty.

Main Results:

  • Achieved exceptionally high quantum state fidelities, up to 0.999998(6).
  • Demonstrated the validity of tight measurement-uncertainty relations in a practical setup.
  • The adapted methods closely approached the theoretical fundamental limits of measurement uncertainty.

Conclusions:

  • Experimental verification of tight measurement-uncertainty relations is feasible.
  • High-fidelity quantum state preparation is key to approaching fundamental measurement limits.
  • This work provides a robust framework for future investigations into quantum measurement precision.