Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 3, 2026

An Electrophysiology Protocol to Measure Reward Anticipation and Processing in Children
Published on: October 4, 2018
Autistic traits modulate frontostriatal connectivity during processing of rewarding faces
Thomas B Sims1, Janina Neufeld2, Tom Johnstone2
1Centre for Integrative Neuroscience and Neurodynamics, School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Reading RG6 6AL, UK b.chakrabarti@reading.ac.uk.
This study explores why individuals with autism often show differences in how they mimic facial expressions. Researchers examined how the brain's reward system interacts with the mirror system, which helps us imitate others. By conditioning participants to associate faces with different reward values, the team measured brain activity between the ventral striatum and the inferior frontal gyrus. They discovered that people with more autistic traits show less brain connectivity when viewing highly rewarding faces. This suggests that difficulties in social mimicry may stem from how the brain processes rewards rather than a basic problem with the imitation system itself.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience research within frontostriatal connectivity studies
- Psychological science investigating autistic traits
Background:
No prior work had resolved the conflicting reports regarding spontaneous versus volitional facial mimicry in autism. Prior research has shown that individuals on the spectrum exhibit distinct patterns of social imitation. That uncertainty drove the investigation into whether reward processing influences these behavioral differences. It was already known that the mirror neuron system plays a role in social interaction. However, the specific interaction between reward-related brain regions and motor imitation areas remained unclear. This gap motivated a closer look at how neural circuits communicate during social tasks. Researchers needed to determine if reward value alters the functional link between specific brain regions. Understanding this mechanism provides a clearer picture of the neurobiological foundations underlying social communication challenges.
Purpose Of The Study:
The study aims to clarify the neural mechanisms underlying facial mimicry differences in individuals with autistic traits. Researchers sought to resolve the inconsistency between spontaneous and volitional mimicry reports in the literature. The primary objective was to test whether reward value influences the functional link between the mirror system and the reward system. By examining this relationship, the team hoped to determine if social mimicry deficits arise from a localized mirror system failure or a broader modulation issue. The investigation focused on how the ventral striatum and the inferior frontal gyrus interact during the observation of rewarding social cues. This motivation stems from the need to understand why social stimuli often elicit different responses in those with high autistic traits. The authors intended to provide a neurobiological explanation for these behavioral observations. Ultimately, the work seeks to bridge the gap between reward processing and social imitation in the human brain.
Main Methods:
The review approach involved analyzing neural data from thirty neurotypical adults during a controlled social task. Participants underwent a conditioning phase where neutral faces were paired with specific reward outcomes. Researchers then employed functional magnetic resonance imaging to monitor brain activity while subjects observed happy facial expressions. The team specifically targeted the ventral striatum and the inferior frontal gyrus for their analysis. This design allowed for the assessment of how reward value influences the communication between these two key regions. The investigators calculated the connectivity strength for both high-reward and low-reward conditions. They also administered standardized assessments to quantify the level of autistic traits in each participant. Statistical models were then applied to determine the relationship between these trait scores and the observed neural connectivity patterns.
Main Results:
The key findings from the literature demonstrate that high-reward happy faces elicit significantly greater ventral striatum to inferior frontal gyrus connectivity than low-reward faces. This neural difference shows a clear negative correlation with the level of autistic traits reported by participants. As the number of autistic traits increases, the strength of this reward-modulated connectivity decreases proportionally. The data suggest that the brain's reward system fails to effectively boost the mirror system in individuals with more autistic traits. This pattern was consistent across the cohort of thirty neurotypical adults tested in the study. The results highlight a specific breakdown in the communication between reward-sensitive and motor-related brain areas. These findings provide empirical evidence that social mimicry deficits are linked to reward processing rather than a primary mirror system failure. The observed effect size underscores the importance of reward value in shaping neural responses to social stimuli.
Conclusions:
The authors propose that the observed social mimicry differences arise from reward system modulation failures. This synthesis suggests that the mirror system itself may remain intact in autistic individuals. The findings imply that the ventral striatum and inferior frontal gyrus interaction is sensitive to social reward. The researchers argue that reduced mimicry is not a localized deficit but a broader network issue. Their data indicate that higher autistic traits correlate with diminished neural sensitivity to rewarding social cues. This study provides a framework for viewing social cognition through the lens of reward-based neural connectivity. The evidence supports a model where social motivation shapes how we process the expressions of others. Future discussions should focus on how reward-based interventions might improve social engagement in clinical populations.
Frequently Asked Questions
The researchers propose that high-reward social stimuli increase functional coupling between the ventral striatum and the inferior frontal gyrus. This neural synchronization is significantly blunted in individuals exhibiting a higher degree of autistic traits compared to those with fewer traits.
The study utilized functional magnetic resonance imaging to assess the interaction between the ventral striatum and the inferior frontal gyrus. These specific brain regions were selected to represent the intersection of reward processing and motor imitation circuits.
The authors explain that conditioning neutral faces with high or low reward values was necessary to isolate the influence of reward on neural responses. This experimental control allowed for a direct comparison between high-reward and low-reward social stimuli.
Functional connectivity data served as the primary metric for evaluating how the brain integrates reward signals with social perception. This quantitative approach allowed the team to map the strength of communication between distinct cortical and subcortical nodes.
The researchers measured the difference in connectivity strength when participants viewed happy expressions associated with high versus low rewards. They observed that this neural difference was negatively proportional to the participant's score on an autistic traits scale.
The authors propose that their findings shift the focus from a primary mirror system deficit to a failure in reward-based modulation. This perspective contrasts with previous theories that suggested a circumscribed impairment in the imitation system itself.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Facial Feedback Hypothesis
Association Areas of the Cortex
Prefrontal Association Area: This area is located in the frontal lobe and is involved in planning, decision-making, and moderating social behavior. It connects with primary motor areas,...
Modeling in Therapy
Participant Modeling
Participant modeling involves therapists demonstrating calm and effective behaviors in...
Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior
Autism Spectrum Disorder
These core symptoms manifest differently among individuals, ranging from mild to severe. The disorder's complexity extends beyond its clinical presentation, encompassing a diverse range of biological, cognitive, and sociocultural influences.

