Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Eukaryotic Promoter Region02:40

The Eukaryotic Promoter Region

16.1K
The eukaryotic promoter region is a segment of DNA located upstream of a gene. It contains an RNA polymerase binding site, a transcription start site, and several cis-regulatory sequences.  The proximal promoter region is located in the vicinity of the gene and has cis-regulatory sequences and the core promoter. The core promoter is the binding site for RNA polymerase and is usually located between -35 and +35 nucleotides from the transcription start site. The distal promoter regions are...
16.1K
The Eukaryotic Promoter Region02:40

The Eukaryotic Promoter Region

3.3K
3.3K
Transcription Initiation01:47

Transcription Initiation

17.0K
Initiation is the first step of transcription in eukaryotes. Prokaryotic RNA Polymerase (RNAP) can bind to the template DNA and start transcribing. On the other hand, transcription in eukaryotes requires additional proteins, called transcription factors, to first bind to the promoter region in the DNA template. This binding helps recruit the specific RNAP that can assemble on the DNA and start transcription.
The promoters and enhancers and their accessory proteins allow tight regulation of...
17.0K
Cis-regulatory Sequences02:02

Cis-regulatory Sequences

9.4K
Cis-regulatory sequences are short fragments of non-coding DNA that are present on the same chromosomes as the genes that they regulate. These fragments serve as binding sites for transcriptional regulators, proteins that are responsible for controlling gene transcription and differential gene expression across cell types in eukaryotes. Cis-regulatory sequences can be close to the gene of interest or thousands of bases away in the DNA sequence; however, those sequences that are further away are...
9.4K
Cis-regulatory Sequences02:02

Cis-regulatory Sequences

3.0K
3.0K
Bacterial Transcription01:53

Bacterial Transcription

25.5K
RNA polymerase (RNAP) carries out DNA-dependent RNA synthesis in both bacteria and eukaryotes. Bacteria do not have a membrane-bound nucleus. So, transcription and translation occur simultaneously, on the same DNA template.
Transcription can be divided into three main stages, each involving distinct DNA sequences to guide the polymerase. These are:
25.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Comparison of two techniques of administering the Valsalva manoeuvre in patients under general anaesthesia: A randomised controlled study.

Indian journal of anaesthesia·2024
Same author

HES1 promoter activation dynamics reveal the plasticity, stemness and heterogeneity in neuroblastoma cancer stem cells.

Journal of cell science·2022
Same author

Workstation peril: Paradoxical inability to ventilate in manual/spontaneous mode with mechanical ventilation modes unaffected.

Indian journal of anaesthesia·2022
Same author

Clinical pearls in anaesthesia for electromyographic tube guided robotic thyroidectomy.

Indian journal of anaesthesia·2021
Same author

Draft Genome Sequence of the Oomycete Globisporangium splendens Strain rgcb-1.

Microbiology resource announcements·2020
Same author

Synthetic Biology Open Language Visual (SBOL Visual) Version 2.1.

Journal of integrative bioinformatics·2019
Same journal

Assessment of lower incisor position and symphysis dimensions among different skeletal patterns in the Chhattisgarh population.

Bioinformation·2026
Same journal

Low T3 syndrome and short-term outcomes in patients with acute decompensated heart failure: A retrospective observational study.

Bioinformation·2026
Same journal

Cardiovascular risk prevention awareness and practices in type 2 diabetes: Linking HbA1c and lipid levels.

Bioinformation·2026
Same journal

Assessment of periodontal condition using basic periodontal examination scores: A retrospective clinical study.

Bioinformation·2026
Same journal

Comparative evaluation of osseointegration among different surface modification techniques in dental implants.

Bioinformation·2026
Same journal

Micro-osteoperforations' impact on orthodontic tooth movement rate: Split mouth research.

Bioinformation·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 27, 2026

In vivo Application of the REMOTE-control System for the Manipulation of Endogenous Gene Expression
08:54

In vivo Application of the REMOTE-control System for the Manipulation of Endogenous Gene Expression

Published on: March 29, 2019

8.2K

A novel sequence and context based method for promoter recognition.

Umesh P1, Jitendra Kumar Dubey2, Karthika Rv1

  • 1Department of Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, University of Kerala, Thiruvananthapuram - 695581, Kerala, India.

Bioinformation
|June 27, 2014
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

A new polymerase-independent algorithm, Promoter Prediction System - PPS-CBM, accurately identifies DNA promoters in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes. This computational method analyzes sequence features and statistical elements for robust promoter prediction.

More Related Videos

Promoter Capture Hi-C: High-resolution, Genome-wide Profiling of Promoter Interactions
10:16

Promoter Capture Hi-C: High-resolution, Genome-wide Profiling of Promoter Interactions

Published on: June 28, 2018

34.4K
Author Spotlight: An Integrated Workflow to Study the Promoter-Centric Spatio-Temporal Genome Architecture in Scarce Cell Populations
11:36

Author Spotlight: An Integrated Workflow to Study the Promoter-Centric Spatio-Temporal Genome Architecture in Scarce Cell Populations

Published on: April 21, 2023

2.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 27, 2026

In vivo Application of the REMOTE-control System for the Manipulation of Endogenous Gene Expression
08:54

In vivo Application of the REMOTE-control System for the Manipulation of Endogenous Gene Expression

Published on: March 29, 2019

8.2K
Promoter Capture Hi-C: High-resolution, Genome-wide Profiling of Promoter Interactions
10:16

Promoter Capture Hi-C: High-resolution, Genome-wide Profiling of Promoter Interactions

Published on: June 28, 2018

34.4K
Author Spotlight: An Integrated Workflow to Study the Promoter-Centric Spatio-Temporal Genome Architecture in Scarce Cell Populations
11:36

Author Spotlight: An Integrated Workflow to Study the Promoter-Centric Spatio-Temporal Genome Architecture in Scarce Cell Populations

Published on: April 21, 2023

2.7K

Area of Science:

  • Computational biology
  • Genomics
  • Bioinformatics

Background:

  • Promoter identification is crucial for understanding transcription regulation.
  • Existing algorithms are often polymerase-dependent, limiting their applicability across different organisms.
  • A universal, polymerase-independent approach is needed for accurate promoter prediction in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a novel polymerase-independent computational algorithm for DNA promoter prediction.
  • To create a tool that can accurately identify promoters in both eukaryotic and prokaryotic DNA sequences.
  • To assess the performance of the proposed algorithm using sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy metrics.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a polymerase-independent algorithm (Promoter Prediction System - PPS-CBM) utilizing sequence features and statistical elements.
  • Incorporated analysis of all possible pentamers, CpG islands, TATA box, initiator elements, and downstream promoter elements.
  • Designed a computational tool for simultaneous testing of multiple DNA sequences with comprehensive result reporting.

Main Results:

  • The PPS-CBM algorithm achieved high accuracy in promoter prediction.
  • Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 75.08%, 83.58%, and 79.33% for E. coli (prokaryote).
  • Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 86.67%, 88.41%, and 87.58% for human (eukaryote) datasets.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed PPS-CBM algorithm offers a robust and versatile method for DNA promoter prediction.
  • The developed tool provides accurate and efficient promoter identification for both prokaryotic and eukaryotic sequences.
  • The polymerase-independent nature of PPS-CBM enhances its applicability in diverse genomic research.