Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 27, 2026

10:38
A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
Published on: July 16, 2015
12.7K
Top-down deactivation of interference from irrelevant spatial or verbal stimulus features
1Department of Cognitive Psychology, University of Trier, Campus I, 54286, Trier, Germany, chfrings@uni-trier.de.
Attention, Perception & Psychophysics
|July 2, 2014
Summary
Top-down deactivation of distractors is key to visual selective attention. Experiments using the Stroop and Simon tasks confirm this, showing quadratic trends in performance when responding to distractors.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Neuroscience
Background:
- The selective-attention model proposes top-down deactivation of distractors.
- This deactivation should result in an inverted-U-shaped activation function for distractor representations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To test the distractor deactivation account against attentional zooming.
- To investigate visual selective attention mechanisms using Stroop and Simon tasks.
Main Methods:
- Experiments employed the Stroop and Simon tasks.
- Performance functions were analyzed for responses to both incongruent and congruent distractors.
- Stimulus onset asynchrony was varied to observe effects on reaction times and error rates.
Main Results:
- Both tasks replicated a quadratic trend in performance for incongruent distractors.
- Linear trends were observed in performance functions for congruent distractors.
- Results support the distractor deactivation hypothesis over attentional zooming.
Conclusions:
- Top-down deactivation of distractor representations is a validated mechanism in visual selective attention.
- The findings provide further evidence for Houghton and Tipper's selective-attention model.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Interference and Decay
609
Forgetting is a complex cognitive phenomenon influenced by several factors, among which interference and decay are particularly prominent. These processes explain why individuals often struggle to retrieve specific information from memory, leading to lapses in recall that can be observed in everyday situations.
Interference occurs when competing memories hinder the retrieval of particular information. It can be classified into two types: proactive and retroactive interference. Proactive...
Interference occurs when competing memories hinder the retrieval of particular information. It can be classified into two types: proactive and retroactive interference. Proactive...
609
Subconsciousness and No Awareness
856
The concept of subconscious awareness refers to the processing of information below the level of conscious thought, which significantly influences both behaviors and decisions. It is also known as waking subconscious awareness. This complex level of cognition operates without the direct awareness of the individual, facilitating rapid and simultaneous handling of multiple information streams.
An illustrative example of subconscious processing is its role in problem-solving. Often, individuals...
An illustrative example of subconscious processing is its role in problem-solving. Often, individuals...
856
Subliminal Perception
1.1K
Subliminal perception refers to the processing of sensory information that occurs below the level of conscious awareness. Researchers study subliminal perception by presenting a stimulus, such as a word or image, very quickly, typically around 50 milliseconds. This rapid presentation is often followed by another stimulus, such as a pattern of dots or lines, which blocks further mental processing of the initial stimulus. As a result, if participants cannot identify the initial stimulus better...
1.1K

