Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 25, 2026

07:19
Comparison of Kinetic Characteristics of Footwork during Stroke in Table Tennis: Cross-Step and Chasse Step
Published on: June 16, 2021
2.3K
Comparison of support leg kinetics between side-step and cross-step cutting techniques
Sports Biomechanics
|August 16, 2014
Summary
The side-step cutting technique increases direction change more than the cross-step technique, but results in a greater loss of forward momentum. Athletes should choose techniques based on whether they prioritize agility or maintaining speed.
Area of Science:
- Biomechanics
- Sports Science
- Kinetics and Kinematics
Background:
- Cutting techniques are crucial in sports for changing direction.
- Understanding the biomechanical differences between side-step (SS) and cross-step (CS) techniques is important for performance optimization.
- Previous research has not fully elucidated the joint moments and power differences during these specific cutting maneuvers.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the support leg joint moments and moment power between SS and CS cutting techniques.
- To quantify the biomechanical demands of each cutting technique at a 90-degree angle.
- To determine the effects of SS and CS techniques on the change in direction and velocity of the center of mass.
Main Methods:
- Collected ground reaction forces (1,000Hz) and 3D kinematics (250Hz) from 20 male college athletes.
- Analyzed normalized peak knee extension moments and work done by knee extensors and ankle plantarflexors.
- Measured direction change angle and decrease in horizontal velocity of the center of mass for both SS and CS techniques.
Main Results:
- Normalized peak knee extension moment was significantly larger in SS (0.40 ± 0.10) compared to CS (0.26 ± 0.08).
- Knee extensors and ankle plantarflexors performed significantly more normalized negative work during SS cutting.
- SS technique resulted in a larger direction change angle (40.5 ± 8.7°) and a greater decrease in center of mass velocity (-0.63 ± 0.23 m/s) than CS (33.0 ± 6.8°, -0.31 ± 0.23 m/s).
Conclusions:
- The side-step technique is more effective for maximizing direction change but leads to a greater reduction in forward velocity.
- The cross-step technique is more advantageous for minimizing the loss of horizontal velocity during cutting maneuvers.
- Athletes can select cutting techniques based on the specific demands of the sport, balancing agility with speed maintenance.

