Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 25, 2026
A Translational Surgical Porcine Model for Postoperative Intra-Abdominal Adhesion Formation
Published on: March 13, 2026
Preventing intraperitoneal adhesions with ethyl pyruvate and hyaluronic acid/carboxymethylcellulose: a comparative
E Kıyak Caglayan1, K Caglayan2, N Erdogan3
1Bozok University, Medical Faculty, Department of Obstetric and Gynecology, Adnan Menderes Bulvarı No:190, Yozgat, Turkey.
Objective:
To compare the effectiveness of ethyl pyruvate (EP) with that of hyaluronic acid+carboxymethyl cellulose (Seprafilm) for the prevention of intraperitoneal adhesions. Seprafilm has been shown to be effective in many experimental and clinical studies.
Study Design:
Thirty rats were divided into three groups at random, and uterine horn abrasion was performed by laparotomy. One group received no treatment (control group), one group received a single intraperitoneal dose of EP 50mg/kg (EP group), and a 2×1-cm patch of Seprafilm was applied in the third group (Seprafilm group). All rats were killed 14 days after surgery. Macroscopic and histopathological evaluation were performed by a surgeon and a pathologist who were blinded to group allocation. Histopathologically, inflammation, fibroblastic activity, foreign body reaction, collagen proliferation, vascular proliferation, Masson-Trichrome score, matrix metalloproteinase-2 score and vascular endothelial growth factor score were studied.
Results:
Median macroscopic intraperitoneal adhesion scores for the control, EP and Seprafilm groups were 2.8, 1.2 and 1.1, respectively. Multiple comparisons between groups showed a significant difference (p<0.05). In binary comparisons, significant differences were found between the control group and the EP group, and between the control group and the Seprafilm group (p<0.05). No significant difference was found between the adhesion scores for the EP group and the Seprafilm group (p>0.05). After histopathological evaluation, significant differences in all parameters were found between the groups (p<0.05). In the paired comparison, significant differences were found between the control group and the EP group, and between the control group and the Seprafilm group (p<0.0167), but no significant difference was found between the EP group and the Seprafilm group (p>0.0167).
Conclusions:
In comparison with the untreated control group, EP and Seprafilm were found to reduce the formation of intraperitoneal adhesions. No significant difference was found between EP and Seprafilm.
