Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 17, 2026

12:48
Investigating Social Cognition in Infants and Adults Using Dense Array Electroencephalography dEEG
Published on: June 27, 2011
18.4K
An electroencephalography network and connectivity analysis for deception in instructed lying tasks
Yue Wang1, Wu Chun Ng1, Khoon Siong Ng1
1Neuroengineering Lab, Mechanical Engineering Department, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Plos One
|February 14, 2015
Summary
This study used electroencephalography (EEG) to analyze brain activity during deception. It found distinct neural network differences between instructed lying (IL) and instructed truth-telling (IT) during the stimulus delivery period (SDP).
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Neuroimaging
- Social Psychology
Background:
- Deception is a significant social behavior extensively studied in recent decades.
- Understanding the cognitive processes underlying deception is crucial for various fields.
- Previous research has explored deception, but neural mechanisms during stimulus processing remain less understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the electrophysiological differences in cognitive processes during the stimulus delivery period (SDP) for instructed lying (IL) versus instructed truth-telling (IT).
- To examine deception in both experienced (WE) and non-experienced (NE) events using electroencephalography (EEG).
- To analyze brain network connectivity in the source space to understand deception mechanisms.
Main Methods:
- An electroencephalography (EEG) study was conducted with participants in a mock interview scenario.
- Participants were instructed to either lie or tell the truth in response to questions about authentic (WE) and fictional (NE) experiences.
- Frequency domain network and connectivity analysis were performed in the source space on EEG data during the SDP.
Main Results:
- Distinct groups of neuronal generators were identified for both instructed lying (IL) and instructed truth-telling (IT) conditions during the SDP.
- Significant differences in intra- and inter-group connectivity were observed between IL and IT conditions for both WE and NE tasks.
- Response times showed varied correlations with the clustering coefficients of specific brain regions (e.g., inferior frontal gyrus, precuneus, angular gyrus, auditory cortex, somatosensory cortex) depending on the condition (IL/IT, WE/NE).
Conclusions:
- The study provides evidence for distinct electrophysiological mechanisms underlying instructed lying and truth-telling during the stimulus delivery period.
- Differences in neural network connectivity during SDP are key to distinguishing deceptive from truthful cognitive processes.
- These findings elucidate the electrophysiological underpinnings of deception at regional, inter-regional, and network levels.

