Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Peer review: a model for professional accountability.

A C Mullins, R E Colavecchio, B E Tescher

    The Journal of Nursing Administration
    |December 1, 1979
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Evidence for the Collective Nature of Radial Flow in Pb+Pb Collisions with the ATLAS Detector.

    Physical review letters·2026
    Same author

    Evidence for the Dimuon Decay of the Higgs Boson in pp Collisions with the ATLAS Detector.

    Physical review letters·2025
    Same author

    Evidence for Longitudinally Polarized W Bosons in the Electroweak Production of Same-Sign W Boson Pairs in Association with Two Jets in pp Collisions at sqrt[s]=13  TeV with the ATLAS Detector.

    Physical review letters·2025
    Same author

    Contracting for care. One nursing approach to the hospitalized borderline patient.

    Journal of psychosocial nursing and mental health services·1985
    Same author

    Care for the caretakers.

    The American journal of nursing·1979
    Same author

    Definition of a standard for clinical nursing practice.

    The Journal of nursing administration·1977

    Implementing a peer review process for professional nurses aids in classification, promotion, and evaluation. This article shares key considerations and challenges encountered during its implementation in a hospital setting.

    Area of Science:

    • Nursing
    • Healthcare Management
    • Professional Development

    Background:

    • Hospitals require robust systems for evaluating nursing staff.
    • Professional nurse development necessitates structured assessment methods.
    • Peer review offers a potential framework for nursing evaluation.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To describe the implementation of a peer review process for nurses.
    • To identify challenges and considerations in establishing nurse peer review.
    • To provide insights for healthcare institutions adopting similar processes.

    Main Methods:

    • Implementation of a peer review system for nurse classification.
    • Application of peer review for nurse promotion.
    • Utilization of peer review for ongoing nurse evaluation.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • Successful implementation of a peer review process in a university hospital.
    • Identification of specific considerations for managing peer review.
    • Recognition of potential challenges in the peer review implementation.

    Conclusions:

    • Peer review is a viable mechanism for nurse evaluation and advancement.
    • Careful planning and management are crucial for effective peer review implementation.
    • Lessons learned can guide other institutions in developing nurse peer review systems.