Fundamental differences between glassy dynamics in two and three dimensions
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 10, 2026

Cooling Rate Dependent Ellipsometry Measurements to Determine the Dynamics of Thin Glassy Films
Published on: January 26, 2016
Elijah Flenner1, Grzegorz Szamel1
1Department of Chemistry, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, USA.
Abstract:
The two-dimensional freezing transition is very different from its three-dimensional counterpart. In contrast, the glass transition is usually assumed to have similar characteristics in two and three dimensions. Using computer simulations, here we show that glassy dynamics in supercooled two- and three-dimensional fluids are fundamentally different. Specifically, transient localization of particles on approaching the glass transition is absent in two dimensions, whereas it is very pronounced in three dimensions. Moreover, the temperature dependence of the relaxation time of orientational correlations is decoupled from that of the translational relaxation time in two dimensions but not in three dimensions. Last, the relationships between the characteristic size of dynamically heterogeneous regions and the relaxation time are very different in two and three dimensions. These results strongly suggest that the glass transition in two dimensions is different than in three dimensions.
Related Concept Videos
First Law: Particles in Two-dimensional Equilibrium
Newton's first law tells us about...
Molecular Comparison of Gases, Liquids, and Solids
Structures of Solids
Dimensionless Groups in Fluid Mechanics
Three-Dimensional Analysis of Strain
First Law: Particles in One-dimensional Equilibrium

