Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification03:00

Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification

5.9K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
5.9K
Review and Preview01:10

Review and Preview

8.9K
In statistics, several tools are used to interpret the data. Measures of central tendency represent the characteristics of the data, such as mean, median, and mode. Additionally, measures of variance like standard deviation and range are used to find the spread of data from the mean. Relative standing measures the distance between data locations. Commonly used measures of relative standings are percentile, z score, and quartiles.
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
8.9K
Review and Preview01:13

Review and Preview

12.2K
Data are individual items of information obtained from a population or sample. Data may be classified as qualitative (categorical), quantitative continuous, or quantitative discrete. Because it is not practical to measure the entire population in a study, researchers use samples to represent the population. A random sample is a representative group from the population chosen by using a method that gives each individual in the population an equal chance of being included in the sample. Random...
12.2K
Proofreading01:43

Proofreading

62.3K
Overview
62.3K
Proofreading01:31

Proofreading

9.9K
Synthesis of new DNA molecules is carried out by the enzyme DNA polymerase, which adds nucleotides on the daughter strand complementary to the template DNA strand. DNA polymerase has a higher affinity to add the correct base and ensures fidelity during DNA replication. Furthermore,  it exhibits proofreading activity during replication, using an exonuclease domain that cuts off incorrect nucleotides from the nascent DNA strand.
Errors During Replication are Corrected by the DNA Polymerase...
9.9K
The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison02:57

The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison

56.8K
According to Charles Cooley, we base our image on what we think other people see (Cooley 1902). We imagine how we must appear to others, then react to this speculation. We don certain clothes, prepare our hair in a particular manner, wear makeup, use cologne, and the like—all with the notion that our presentation of ourselves is going to affect how others perceive us. We expect a certain reaction, and, if lucky, we get the one we desire and feel good about it. But more than that, Cooley...
56.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Knowledge is a right: fixing open access flaws.

European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery·2025
Same author

University rankings: Time to reconsider.

BioImpacts : BI·2025
Same author

Excess of open access.

European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery·2024
Same author

Dismantling discrimination through education.

Canadian medical education journal·2024
Same author

Maize's origin to be revisited.

Plant signaling & behavior·2024
Same author

Nobel Prize paradox: Nobel Prize, not a noble prize.

Revista clinica espanola·2024
Same journal

Targeting developmental reprogramming: hPSC insights for cancer interception.

Trends in pharmacological sciences·2026
Same journal

July 2026 issue first authors.

Trends in pharmacological sciences·2026
Same journal

Chronobiomaterials for circadian-aligned brain therapeutics.

Trends in pharmacological sciences·2026
Same journal

Biosensors for translatable GPCR bias.

Trends in pharmacological sciences·2026
Same journal

ECM stiffness and epigenetics in organ fibrosis.

Trends in pharmacological sciences·2026
Same journal

Which HTT transcript to lower?

Trends in pharmacological sciences·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 8, 2026

Author Spotlight: Biological Standardization to Ensure Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research
04:50

Author Spotlight: Biological Standardization to Ensure Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research

Published on: August 4, 2023

1.8K

A proposal for an 'equal peer-review' statement.

Khaled Moustafa1

  • 1Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers, Paris, France.

Trends in Pharmacological Sciences
|June 27, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

To enhance objectivity in scientific publishing, an "equal peer-review" system is proposed. This method anonymizes authors to eliminate bias from institutional prestige, ensuring fair evaluation for all researchers.

Keywords:
blind peer reviewdouble blind peer reviewequal peer reviewfame biasmanuscript submissionpeer review

More Related Videos

Automated Sample Preparation for the Multiplexed Analysis of Single-Cell Histone Post-Translational Modifications (sc-hPTM2)
07:21

Automated Sample Preparation for the Multiplexed Analysis of Single-Cell Histone Post-Translational Modifications (sc-hPTM2)

Published on: December 19, 2025

32.1K
Rup (RNA-seq Usability Assessment Pipeline) - Quality Control for Bulk RNA-seq Experiments in Eukaryotes
05:07

Rup (RNA-seq Usability Assessment Pipeline) - Quality Control for Bulk RNA-seq Experiments in Eukaryotes

Published on: November 7, 2025

535

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 8, 2026

Author Spotlight: Biological Standardization to Ensure Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research
04:50

Author Spotlight: Biological Standardization to Ensure Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research

Published on: August 4, 2023

1.8K
Automated Sample Preparation for the Multiplexed Analysis of Single-Cell Histone Post-Translational Modifications (sc-hPTM2)
07:21

Automated Sample Preparation for the Multiplexed Analysis of Single-Cell Histone Post-Translational Modifications (sc-hPTM2)

Published on: December 19, 2025

32.1K
Rup (RNA-seq Usability Assessment Pipeline) - Quality Control for Bulk RNA-seq Experiments in Eukaryotes
05:07

Rup (RNA-seq Usability Assessment Pipeline) - Quality Control for Bulk RNA-seq Experiments in Eukaryotes

Published on: November 7, 2025

535

Area of Science:

  • Scientific publishing
  • Research integrity

Background:

  • Peer review is crucial for scientific validity.
  • Potential biases can arise from author or institutional prestige.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a novel peer-review framework for increased objectivity.
  • To mitigate bias in the evaluation of scientific work.

Main Methods:

  • Introduction of an "equal peer-review" statement.
  • Mandatory author anonymity throughout the review process.

Main Results:

  • Elimination of bias stemming from author or institutional prestige.
  • Establishment of a uniformly equitable review process.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed "equal peer-review" enhances fairness and objectivity.
  • This approach benefits all authors and grant applicants by ensuring unbiased evaluation.