Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 6, 2026

Modeling Posthemorrhagic Hydrocephalus of Prematurity in Rats
Published on: March 28, 2025
Outcome of pediatric patients referred for papilledema
Jessica J Kovarik1, Poonam N Doshi2, Janine E Collinge3
1Nicklaus Children's Hospital, Miami Children's Health System, Miami, Florida.
Insights
The incidence of true papilledema in children referred for suspected cases is very low. Headache is a common, nonspecific symptom; urgent evaluation is often unnecessary without additional signs of increased intracranial pressure or vision loss.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Ophthalmology
- Neurology
- Ophthalmology
Background:
- Papilledema, or optic disc swelling, can be a sign of increased intracranial pressure.
- Differentiating true papilledema from pseudopapilledema is crucial for appropriate patient management.
- Referrals for suspected papilledema in children often require careful evaluation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the prevalence of papilledema versus pseudopapilledema in children referred for suspected papilledema.
- To identify clinical factors that help differentiate between papilledema and pseudopapilledema.
Main Methods:
- Prospective, cross-sectional analysis of pediatric patients (<18 years) referred for suspected papilledema.
- Detailed ophthalmologic and neurologic evaluations were performed.
- Study conducted between April 2012 and February 2014.
Main Results:
- 34 patients were analyzed; 26 had pseudopapilledema or normal variants.
- Only 2 patients were diagnosed with true papilledema.
- Headache was a common symptom (25/34), but only 2 papilledema patients had additional concerning symptoms.
Conclusions:
- True papilledema is rare in children referred for this suspicion.
- Headache is a nonspecific symptom; additional signs of increased intracranial pressure or vision loss are key.
- Noninvasive tests like ultrasonography can aid in distinguishing pseudopapilledema.
Purpose:
To determine the prevalence of papilledema versus pseudopapilledema among children referred for suspected papilledema and to identify clinical factors differentiating the two diagnoses.
Methods:
This is a prospective, cross-sectional analysis of patients <18 years old referred to a pediatric ophthalmology clinic for suspected papilledema by ophthalmoscopic examination between April 2012 and February 2014. Patients underwent detailed ophthalmologic and, when indicated, neurologic evaluation to determine the presence or absence of papilledema.
Results:
A total of 34 patients were identified. Of these, 26 patients were diagnosed with pseudopapilledema or a normal variant; 2, with papilledema; and 6, with unrelated or indeterminate etiology. Headache was a presenting symptom in 25 patients. Five patients complained of additional symptoms suggestive of increased intracranial pressure, of whom 2 were patients diagnosed with papilledema.
Conclusions:
The incidence of true papilledema among children referred for suspected papilledema based on fundus examination is very low. Headache is a common nonspecific symptom in most patients, whether or not they have papilledema. If children have no additional signs and/or symptoms suggestive of elevated ICP or vision loss, the need for evaluation of such children is not urgent. A detailed history and examination coupled with noninvasive testing, such as ultrasonography, will generally distinguish pseudopapilledema from other abnormal-appearing optic nerves.
More Related Videos
03:13Author Spotlight: A Single-Entry Point Endoscopic Intraventricular Approach for Third Ventriculostomy and Pineal Biopsy
Published on: June 28, 2024
14:59Neuronavigation and Laparoscopy Guided Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Insertion for the Treatment of Hydrocephalus
Published on: October 14, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Glaucoma: Overview
Angle Closure Glaucoma: Treatment