[Diffusion of fluorescent and magnetic molecular probes in brain interstitial space]

To compare the diffusion properties of fluorescent probes dextran-tetramethylrhodamine (DT) and lucifer yellow CH (LY) and magnetic probe gadolinium-diethylene triamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-DTPA) in porous media and to screen out a suitable fluorescent probe for optical imaging of brain interstitial space (ISS).

Agarose gels sample were divided into DT group, LY group and Gd-DTPA group, and the corresponding molecular probes were imported in each group. The dynamic diffusions of DT and LY in agarose gels at different time points (15, 30, 45, 60, 90, and 120 min) were scanned with laser scanning confocal microscope, the dynamic diffusion of Gd-DTPA was imaged with magnetic resonance imaging. The average diffusion speed of LY were demonstrated to be consistent with those of Gd-DTPA. The LY was introduced into caudate putamen of 18 rats, respectively, the diffusion of LY in the sequential slices of rat brain at different time points (0.5, 1, 2, 3, 7, 11 h) were scanned, and the results were compared with those of rats' brain with Gd-DTPA imported and imaged in vivo with magnetic resonance imaging.

The diffusions of the three probes were isotropic in the agarose gels, and the average diffusion speeds of DT, LY and Gd-DTPA were: (0.07±0.02)×10(-2) mm2/s, (1.54±0.47)×10(-2) mm2/s, (1.45±0.50)×10(-2) mm2/s, respectively. The speed of DT was more slower than both LY and Gd-DTPA (ANOVA, F=367.15, P<0.001; Post-Hoc LSD, P<0.001), and there was no significant difference between the speeds of LY and Gd-DTPA (Post-Hoc LSD, P=0.091). The variation tendency of diffusion area of DT was different with both that of LY and that of Gd-DTPA (Bonferroni correction, α=0.0125, P<0.001), and there was no significant difference between LY and Gd-DTPA (Bonferroni correction, α=0.0125, P=0.203), in analysis by repeated measures data of ANOVA. The diffusions of LY and Gd-DTPA were anisotropy in rat caudate putamen,and the average diffusion speeds of LY and Gd-DTPA were: (1.03±0.29)×10(-3) mm2/s, (0.81±0.27)×10(-3) mm2/s, respectively, no significant difference was demonstrated (t=0.759, P=0.490); half-time of single intensity of LY and Gd-DTPA was (2.58±0.04) h, (2.46±0.10) h, respectively, no significant difference was found (t=2.025, P=0.113). The diffusion area ratios between LY and Gd-DTPA in rat caudate putamen was not statistically different at hours 0.5, 1, 2, 3 and 7 (t=2.249, P=0.088; t=2.582, P=0.061; t=1.966, P=0.121; t=0.132, P=0.674; t=0.032, P=0.976), while, a slightly difference was found at 11 h (t=2.917, P=0.043,in analysis by t test).

LY present the same diffusion property with Gd-DTPA in porous media witch including agarose gels and live rat brain tissue, indicates that LY is a suitable fluorescent probe for optical imaging of brain ISS, and it can be used for microscopic, macro and in vitro measure of brain ISS.