When sentences live up to your expectations
Johannes Tuennerhoff1, Uta Noppeney2
1Max-Planck-Institute for Biological Cybernetics, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.
Neuroimage
|September 13, 2015
Summary
The brain decodes speech by combining incoming sounds with internal predictions. Top-down predictions are crucial for understanding speech, especially when auditory signals are unclear.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Auditory Processing
- Cognitive Science
Background:
- The brain's mechanism for decoding intelligible speech from noisy acoustic signals remains largely unknown.
- Speech recognition is a rapid, automatic, and robust cognitive process.
- Understanding the interplay between bottom-up sensory input and top-down cognitive processes is key.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how the brain integrates bottom-up acoustic signals with top-down predictions for speech recognition.
- To determine the neural correlates of speech intelligibility and prediction error.
- To elucidate the role of predictive coding in auditory perception.
Main Methods:
- Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was used to measure brain activity.
- Participants listened to normal intelligible speech and unintelligible fine structure speech.
- Top-down predictions were manipulated using auditory priming techniques.
Main Results:
- Unintelligible speech activated primary auditory cortices, while intelligible speech (enhanced by predictions) engaged posterior middle temporal areas.
- Normal speech consistently activated posterior middle temporal areas, regardless of prediction manipulation.
- Prediction errors, when speech violated expectations, led to increased activation in anterior temporal gyri/sulci.
Conclusions:
- The brain recognizes speech by integrating bottom-up acoustic information with top-down predictions.
- Top-down predictions are essential for making fine structure speech intelligible and driving neural activation.
- Anterior temporal lobe activity signals prediction errors, indicating the need for semantic integration, supporting predictive coding models of perception.
Related Concept Videos
Expected Value
8.3K
The expected value is known as the "long-term" average or mean. This means that over the long term of experimenting over and over, you would expect this average. The expected average is represented by the symbol μ. It is calculated as follows:
8.3K
Hindsight Biases
4.5K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now?
4.5K
Framing Effects
8.1K
Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in...
8.1K
Determination of Expected Frequency
2.7K
Suppose one wants to test independence between the two variables of a contingency table. The values in the table constitute the observed frequencies of the dataset. But how does one determine the expected frequency of the dataset? One of the important assumptions is that the two variables are independent, which means the variables do not influence each other. For independent variables, the statistical probability of any event involving both variables is calculated by multiplying the individual...
2.7K
Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies
43.1K
When we hold a stereotype about a person, we have expectations that he or she will fulfill that stereotype. A self-fulfilling prophecy is an expectation held by a person that alters his or her behavior in a way that tends to make it true. When we hold stereotypes about a person, we tend to treat the person according to our expectations. This treatment can influence the person to act according to our stereotypic expectations, thus confirming our stereotypic beliefs. Research by Rosenthal and...
43.1K
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
4.3K
When developing expected outcomes for a patient care plan, the nurse should adhere to the following recommendations:
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
4.3K


