Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 31, 2026

Implementation of Portable Emissions Measurement Systems PEMS for the Real-driving Emissions RDE Regulation in Europe
Published on: December 4, 2016
Licensing failure in the European decentralised procedure
Joris Langedijk1, Hans C Ebbers2, Aukje K Mantel-Teeuwisse3
1Division of Pharmacoepidemiology & Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS), Utrecht University, PO Box 80 082, 3508 TB Utrecht, the Netherlands; Medicines Evaluation Board, PO Box 8275, 3503 RG Utrecht, the Netherlands.
European Union drug licensing applications via the decentralized procedure have a low failure rate of 9.8%. Most failures involved quality and clinical objections, but withdrawal reasons can be complex.
Area of Science:
- Pharmaceutical Sciences
- Regulatory Affairs
- Drug Development
Background:
- The European Union (EU) decentralized procedure is a primary route for marketing authorization applications.
- Limited data exists on licensing failures within the EU decentralized procedure compared to other regulatory pathways.
- Understanding licensing failure is crucial for optimizing drug approval processes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the frequency of licensing failure for marketing authorization applications submitted via the EU decentralized procedure.
- To identify the key determinants and reasons behind licensing failures in this regulatory pathway.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of completed marketing authorization procedures between 2008 and 2012 where The Netherlands served as the leading authority.
- Assessment of licensing failures, including refusals and withdrawals.
- Categorization and evaluation of major objections cited in failed applications.
Main Results:
- A total of 492 procedures were completed, with 48 (9.8%) resulting in licensing failure (8 refusals, 40 withdrawals).
- A diverse range of major objections were identified, affecting both product quality (48 objections) and clinical aspects (45 objections).
- The overall low failure rate may be attributed to consistent communication between regulatory authorities and applicants.
Conclusions:
- The EU decentralized procedure demonstrates a relatively low rate of licensing failure.
- Quality and clinical issues represent significant, though not exclusive, reasons for application failure.
- Factors beyond regulatory objections, such as financial feasibility and applicant willingness to address concerns, influence withdrawal decisions.
Related Concept Videos
Legal Guidelines for Documentation
Global Regulatory Systems
Drug Control Governance: Regulatory Bodies and Their Impact
Clinically Relevant Drug Product Specifications: Methods of Establishment
Drug Regulation

