The structure of distractor-response bindings: Conditions for configural and elemental integration

Human action control is influenced by bindings between perceived stimuli and responses carried out in their presence. Notably, responses given to a target stimulus can also be integrated with additional response-irrelevant distractor stimuli that accompany the target (distractor-response binding). Subsequently reencountering such a distractor then retrieves the associated response. Although a large body of evidence supports the existence of this effect, the specific structure of distractor-response bindings is still unclear. Here, we test the predictions derived from 2 possible assumptions about the structure of bindings between distractors and responses. According to a configural approach, the entire distractor object is integrated with a response, and only upon repetition of the entire distractor object the associated response would be retrieved. According to an elemental approach, one would predict integration of individual distractor features with the response and retrieval due to the repetition of an individual distractor feature. Four experiments indicate that both, configural and elemental bindings exist and specify boundary conditions for each type of binding. These findings provide detailed insights into the architecture of bindings between response-irrelevant stimuli and actions and thus allow for specifying how distractor stimuli influence human behavior. (PsycINFO Database Record