Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Multisensory temporal binding induces an illusory gap/overlap that reduces the expected audiovisual interactions on saccades but not manual responses.

PloS one·2022
Same author

Linguistic processes do not beat visuo-motor constraints, but they modulate where the eyes move regardless of word boundaries: Evidence against top-down word-based eye-movement control during reading.

PloS one·2019
Same author

The magnification factor accounts for the greater hypometria and imprecision of larger saccades: Evidence from a parametric human-behavioral study.

Journal of vision·2017
Same author

A Model of the Superior Colliculus Predicts Fixation Locations during Scene Viewing and Visual Search.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2017
Same author

No Evidence for a Saccadic Range Effect for Visually Guided and Memory-Guided Saccades in Simple Saccade-Targeting Tasks.

PloS one·2016
Same author

Integration of parafoveal orthographic information during foveal word reading: beyond the sub-lexical level?

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2016
Same journal

How does optical blur affect audiovisual speech perception and emotion perception?

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same journal

Is there a cost in forming statistical summary representations at multiple spatial scales?

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same journal

Low prevalence targets are primarily missed due to mind wandering.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same journal

An introduction to the special issue celebrating Mary A. Peterson.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same journal

Properties of the threshold stimulus exposure duration (TSED) measure of visual search efficiency.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same journal

Auditory selective attention in depth: Investigating directional dependency across front, lateral, and rear spaces.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 30, 2026

Robotized Testing of Camera Positions to Determine Ideal Configuration for Stereo 3D Visualization of Open-Heart Surgery
05:12

Robotized Testing of Camera Positions to Determine Ideal Configuration for Stereo 3D Visualization of Open-Heart Surgery

Published on: August 12, 2021

2.6K

On the optimal viewing position for object processing.

Lotje van der Linden1, Françoise Vitu2

  • 1Laboratoire de Psychologie Cognitive (LPC), UMR 7290, CNRS, Aix-Marseille Université, Centre St Charles, Bâtiment 9, Case D, 3 place Victor Hugo, CS 80249, 13331, Marseille cedex 03, France. l.vanderlinden@cogsci.nl.

Attention, Perception & Psychophysics
|November 21, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Optimal viewing position effects generalize from words to objects, but word processing shows a language-specific leftward bias. Object viewing reveals a purer measure of visual constraints on eye movements.

Keywords:
Eye movementsFixation durationFixation locationObject identificationOptimal viewing positionRefixationsWord identification

More Related Videos

Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition
07:45

Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition

Published on: July 21, 2020

5.1K
A Method to Quantify Visual Information Processing in Children Using Eye Tracking
09:47

A Method to Quantify Visual Information Processing in Children Using Eye Tracking

Published on: July 9, 2016

18.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 30, 2026

Robotized Testing of Camera Positions to Determine Ideal Configuration for Stereo 3D Visualization of Open-Heart Surgery
05:12

Robotized Testing of Camera Positions to Determine Ideal Configuration for Stereo 3D Visualization of Open-Heart Surgery

Published on: August 12, 2021

2.6K
Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition
07:45

Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition

Published on: July 21, 2020

5.1K
A Method to Quantify Visual Information Processing in Children Using Eye Tracking
09:47

A Method to Quantify Visual Information Processing in Children Using Eye Tracking

Published on: July 9, 2016

18.3K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Visual Perception
  • Eye Movement Research

Background:

  • Optimal viewing position (OVP) effects demonstrate that visual stimuli are processed most efficiently when initial fixation is near the center, with a leftward bias for words.
  • These effects, characterized by U-shaped or inverted U-shaped curves, are typically explained by visual and language constraints.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether OVP effects extend to object viewing and to compare the strength and symmetry of these effects for words versus objects.
  • To differentiate between visual and language-specific contributions to OVP effects.

Main Methods:

  • Participants performed object-naming and word-naming tasks.
  • Initial fixation positions on line drawings of objects and their corresponding written names were manipulated.
  • Response times, refixation probabilities, and fixation durations were analyzed to determine OVP effects.

Main Results:

  • Both object and word viewing exhibited U-shaped OVP curves, confirming generalization to object perception.
  • OVP effects were generally weaker for objects than for words.
  • Word viewing showed a leftward bias, while object viewing resulted in symmetrical curves.

Conclusions:

  • OVP effects are not exclusive to word processing and are influenced by visual constraints in object viewing.
  • The leftward bias observed in word processing suggests a language-specific component, distinct from general visual processing.
  • Object viewing provides a clearer indication of visual constraints on eye movement patterns during perception.