Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Parvulescu Revisited: Small Tank Acoustics for Bioacousticians.

Peter H Rogers1, Anthony D Hawkins2, Arthur N Popper3

  • 1Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 30332, USA. peter.rogers@gatech.edu.

Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology
|November 28, 2015
PubMed
Summary

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Microbubbles manufactured using a tissue homogeniser: DoE-guided optimisation for a narrower size distribution and higher yield.

International journal of pharmaceutics·2026
Same author

Low-intensity focused ultrasound to human amygdala reveals a causal role in ambiguous emotion processing and alters local and network activity.

Neuron·2026
Same author

Subharmonics are not an infallible safety metric for cavitation dynamics.

International journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group·2026
Same author

Ultrasound-Triggered Gelation for Restoring Biomechanical Properties of Degenerated Functional Spinal Units.

Advanced healthcare materials·2025
Same author

Approaches to understanding effects from particle motion and substrate-borne vibration on fishes and invertebrates.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2025
Same author

Acoustically Transparent Sample Containers for Quantitative Cavitation Imaging.

IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control·2025
This summary is machine-generated.

Fish hearing research in tanks is flawed because tank acoustics differ from natural environments. Understanding these acoustic differences is crucial for accurate fish auditory studies and interpreting results.

Area of Science:

  • Aquatic acoustics
  • Bioacoustics
  • Fish auditory research

Background:

  • Laboratory fish hearing studies frequently use small tanks.
  • Acoustic fields in tanks significantly deviate from natural underwater environments.
  • Fish auditory systems may use acoustic pressure, particle velocity, or both as stimuli.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the acoustic discrepancies between laboratory tanks and natural fish habitats.
  • To emphasize the importance of understanding tank acoustics for valid fish hearing research.
  • To provide context for interpreting fish auditory study results.

Main Methods:

  • The abstract does not specify methods, but implies acoustic field analysis within tanks.
  • Comparison of acoustic parameters (pressure, particle velocity) in controlled vs. natural settings.
Keywords:
Aquarium acousticsHearing thresholdUnderwater hearing test facilities

Related Experiment Videos

  • Review of fish auditory system stimulus reception.

    • Main Results:

    • Small tanks generate acoustic fields dissimilar to natural environments.
    • These acoustic differences can impact the interpretation of fish hearing study outcomes.
    • The specific auditory stimulus (pressure, particle velocity) utilized by fish is a key factor.

    Conclusions:

    • Accurate fish auditory research necessitates understanding and accounting for laboratory tank acoustics.
    • Deviations in acoustic fields can compromise the ecological validity of tank-based studies.
    • Underwater acousticians must consider these factors for reliable data interpretation.