Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Improvements in MR angiography using phase-corrected data sets.

T L Chenevert1, K P Fechner, D Y Gelblum

  • 1Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor 48109.

Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
|April 1, 1989
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Safety of thoracic radiotherapy in patients with prior immune-related adverse events from immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology·2020
Same author

Spiral T1 Spin-Echo for Routine Postcontrast Brain MRI Exams: A Multicenter Multireader Clinical Evaluation.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2020
Same author

Multisite Concordance of DSC-MRI Analysis for Brain Tumors: Results of a National Cancer Institute Quantitative Imaging Network Collaborative Project.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2018
Same author

Diffusion MRI in early cancer therapeutic response assessment.

NMR in biomedicine·2016
Same author

Phase I study of weekly nab-paclitaxel + weekly cetuximab + intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in patients with stage III-IVB head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).

Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology·2014
Same author

Imaging vascular function for early stage clinical trials using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

European radiology·2012
Same journal

Multi-Contrast Human Brain CEST MRI at 11.7 T: First In Vivo Demonstration.

Magnetic resonance in medicine·2026
Same journal

Suppression of Oscillation and Ghosting in RF-Spoiled Gradient-Echo-Based Dynamic Imaging.

Magnetic resonance in medicine·2026
Same journal

A Simple, Dynamic Geometric Phantom for MRI and CT Reconstruction Pipelines: Beyond Shepp-Logan.

Magnetic resonance in medicine·2026
Same journal

7T 3D-EPI PCASL With High SNR Efficiency and Robustness to Through-Plane B<sub>0</sub> Field Gradients.

Magnetic resonance in medicine·2026
Same journal

A Comparison of Tissue Property Values Estimated Using Conventional Cardiac MRF and MT-Cardiac MRF.

Magnetic resonance in medicine·2026
Same journal

Dependence of the Extra-Cellular Diffusion Coefficient on the Fractions of Neurites and Cell Bodies in Gray Matter.

Magnetic resonance in medicine·2026
See all related articles

This study refines Magnetic Resonance Angiography (MRA) by correcting phase errors in postprocessing. This improves static signal subtraction, enhancing the clarity of MRA images for better flow visualization.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging
  • Biophysics
  • Radiology

Background:

  • Magnetic Resonance Angiography (MRA) is crucial for visualizing blood vessels.
  • Static signal subtraction is key for MRA but is inhibited by phase errors.
  • Existing MRA techniques struggle with systematic phase errors affecting image quality.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To refine MRA techniques through postprocessing.
  • To remove phase errors that hinder static signal subtraction.
  • To improve the sensitivity and clarity of MRA for enhanced flow detection.

Main Methods:

  • Acquired projective views using interleaved flow-compensated and noncompensated gradient waveforms.
  • Employed complex subtraction of datasets with a projection dephase pulse for static signal suppression.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Estimated phase errors using spatial filtered data acquired without dephasing, then applied corrections to high-resolution data.

    • Main Results:

    • Successfully modeled and corrected systematic phase errors in MRA data.
    • Demonstrated significant improvement in MR angiograms.
    • Enhanced flow sensitivity in high-resolution MRA datasets.

    Conclusions:

    • Postprocessing removal of phase errors is an effective MRA refinement technique.
    • The developed method improves static signal subtraction and overall image quality.
    • This technique enhances MRA visualization, as shown in rat studies on a 2-T system.